Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

FortiManager and FortiAnalyzer GUI flaws allow authenticated code execution

Original title: Improper control of generation of code in GUI

Fortinet PSIRT ()
Part of a story covered by 20 sourcesFortinet revises FortiManager and FortiAnalyzer advisories without naming fixesMerged summary & timeline
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

FG-IR-26-227 combines CWE-94 code injection and a CWE-120 buffer overflow, scored CVSS 7.2.

Fortinet revised FG-IR-26-227 on November 10. Code injection and a classic buffer overflow in the GUI of FortiManager, FortiAnalyzer and both cloud products may let a remote authenticated attacker execute unauthorized code or commands through crafted HTTP requests. The CVSSv3 score is 7.2. No affected versions, fixed release or exploitation status appears in the snippet.

Unconfirmed: Affected versions, a patch and real-world exploitation are not stated.

Key facts
  • Weaknesses cited are CWE-94 and CWE-120.
  • The attack path is crafted HTTP requests.
  • The attacker must already be authenticated.
  • The advisory was revised on November 10, 2026.
Security assessment · AI, from the article

Impact: remote authenticated code or command execution

ProductAffected
Fortinet FortiManager—
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer—
Fortinet FortiManager Cloud—
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer Cloud—
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

CVSSv3 Score: 7. 2 An Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability [CWE-94] and a Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') vulnerability [CWE-120] in FortiManager, FortiAnalyzer, FortiManager Cloud, and FortiAnalyzer Cloud may allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted HTTP requests. Revised on 2026-11-10 00:00:00

Fortinet PSIRT

fortiguard.fortinet.com

Read the full article at Fortinet PSIRT

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.