Here’s how experts think CISA should tell agencies to protect OT
Experts urge CISA to issue a binding directive requiring federal agencies to secure operational technology.
A coalition of cyber firms and critical-infrastructure operators urged CISA to issue a binding operational directive on how federal civilian agencies should secure operational technology. It wants a named OT security owner, use of existing NSA and CISA guidance, and minimum practices aligned with CISA's 2022 cybersecurity performance goals. A recent GAO report found most federal civilian executive branch agencies have not met 2023 OMB requirements for networked IoT and OT. The paper cites this summer's water-utility attacks and says CISA lacks a full view of federal OT, including programmable logic controllers across about 8,000 GSA properties.
- OT Cybersecurity Coalition wants a CISA binding directive focused on federal OT.
- GAO found most civilian agencies missed 2023 OMB IoT and OT requirements.
- Recommendations include naming an OT owner and aligning with CISA goals.
- The paper cites summer water-utility attacks and weak federal OT visibility.
- CISA covered OT in earlier BODs but has no OT-only directive.
Full article799 words · extracted from cyberscoop.com · click to collapse
Get our latest cybersecurity news first on Google.
Government auditors say federal agencies haven’t met mandated security steps for operational technology, which hackers targeted in water sector attacks this summer.
A coalition of cyber firms and critical infrastructure operators on Tuesday spelled out its views on the tasks that the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency should assign federal agencies to protect operational technology systems after this summer’s attacks on water utilities.
The Operational Technology Cybersecurity Coalition said a CISA binding operational directive (BOD) for OT should specify who is responsible for protecting these systems at each agency,, draw on existing federal guidelines and set minimum cybersecurity practices.
The coalition said the BOD would address a need to act based on CISA’s lack of visibility into the spectrum of OT devices in federal agencies, a lack of consistent across-the-board OT security policies and the severity of the consequences that an attack on federal OT could produce.
Just last month, the Government Accountability Office published a report which concluded that most federal civilian executive branch agencies (FCEBs) haven’t enacted Office of Management and Budget requirements released in 2023 for networked Internet of Things and OT devices.
Putting forward recommendations for a CISA directive has two goals, said Michael Garcia, policy director of the coalition.
“One, it does make sure that the government is taking its own medicine,” said Garcia, who until recently worked at the agency. “You should practice what you preach. … Second, it sends a very strong signal to the private sector that, ‘This is what we think is important: As an OT partner, owner or operator or critical infrastructure owner or operator, [this is what] you should ask other providers to do.’”
There are 8,000 General Services Administration-owned and -leased properties, many of which would have OT involved in everything from power supply to heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems. Some of those OT systems might be “trivial,” Garcia acknowledged, but the coalition paper notes that CISA “does not currently have a holistic view of the assets managed by the FCEB and the potential risks, such as connected programmable logic controllers, to which the government may be exposed.”
With OT falling into a “government gray zone” between chief information officers and facilities managers, CISA should tell agencies to formally designate an officer in charge of cybersecurity for OT, the coalition recommends.
The directive should examine past OT guidelines the National Security Agency issued to see if they should apply to federal civilian agencies, and align any requirements in the hypothetical BOD with cybersecurity performance goals that CISA first issued in 2022, according to the coalition.
The coalition doesn’t assert that such a BOD would have headed off the attacks this summer on the water sector, and is focused on federal OT, something where CISA has done some work.
“To be fair, CISA has incorporated OT security requirements into prior directives (such as BODs 23-01, 23-02, and 26-04) alongside a host of technical guidance,” the paper reads. “But as AI reduces the technical barriers to sophisticated cyber operations, enabling adversaries to identify weaknesses, accelerate reconnaissance, and move laterally through poorly segmented operational environments with greater speed and scale, it is time for an encompassing BOD solely focused on OT security.”
CISA didn’t respond to a request for comment Monday in advance of the coalition publishing its paper.
But Garcia said that in discussions with CISA, “increasingly, I think they understand that there might be a need” for an OT BOD.
Latest Podcasts
Government
US is looking to weave AI into critical infrastructure for cybersecurity, national cyber director says
As AI world debates security, NVIDIA releases open source tools for agents
ShinyHunters trades financial extortion for a reckless war of ego with the FBI
Supreme Court permits states to use SAVE database for citizenship checks
Technology
Threats
Authorities seize KillSec extortion group infrastructure, arrest 3 alleged members
AI policy circles targeted in China-linked phishing operation
Attackers exploited Citrix NetScaler zero-day for at least three weeks undetected
Russian hackers Star Blizzard expand targeting, change up tactics to reach Ukraine and beyond
Policy
House and Senate members propose legislation for CISA to step up cyber defenses for biotech
Bipartisan Senate leaders introduce bill to bolster telecom cybersecurity in response to Salt Typhoon hacks
The president has called for AI leadership. Here’s the mission.
After water attacks, Capitol Hill offers its own proposal for an AI-cyber test program