Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Top AI spenders cut per-employee costs by nearly 10 percent in August

The Decoderby Matthias Bastian ()3 min read7
AI summary · glm-5.3-flashSummaries by Vani AI

Ramp's September AI Index shows top AI spenders' per-employee costs fell 9.7% in August as firms migrate from frontier models to cheaper standard models.

Ramp's September 2026 AI Index reports median per-employee AI spending at the top 1% of spenders fell 9.7% in August to $7,205, partly attributed to August vacations, falling token prices, and migration to cheaper models. The effective price per million tokens dropped 41% from its March 2026 peak to $0.68, and frontier models like Opus, Fable, and Sol fell from 53% to 45% of tokens consumed. Anthropic was paid for by 43.8% of US companies (up 0.34 points) versus 39.8% for OpenAI (up 0.09 points), while open-weight models remain marginal at 6.4% of AI-using firms.

Key facts
  • Median per-employee AI spend at top 1% of spenders fell 9.7% to $7,205 in August.
  • Effective token price dropped 41% from March 2026 peak to $0.68 per million tokens.
  • Frontier model token share fell from 53% in early August to 45% by early September.
  • Only 6.4% of AI-using companies on Ramp run open-weight models; open adoption stays low.
  • Anthropic paid adoption reached 43.8% versus OpenAI's 39.8%; IT and finance lead adoption.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

3 min read at the-decoder.com

The Ramp AI Index for September 2026 shows AI spending per employee among the top 1 percent of US companies fell nearly 10 percent in August. The price per million tokens has dropped 41 percent since March 2026, and companies are actively shifting usage away from expensive frontier models toward cheaper alternatives.

The Decoder

By Matthias Bastian · the-decoder.com

Read the full article at The Decoder

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.