Weather Data Spoofing Attacks on Rain-Adaptive Millimeter-Wave Frequency Selection in V2X Communication Networks
Spoofed rainfall inputs let attackers dictate V2X millimeter-wave carrier selection without transmitting, halving platoon range or quadrupling latency in ns-3 simulations.
The paper shows spoofing only the rainfall sensor input lets an adversary control which mmWave carrier a connected vehicle selects, without transmitting on the channel. In MilliCar/ns-3 simulations with real 3GPP NR V2X propagation, forcing the 73 GHz band held an eight-vehicle platoon's reliable range at 38 m versus an 82 m honest baseline, while forcing 5 GHz kept 97% long-range reception but quadrupled long-range latency to 12.5 ms. A receiver-side SINR cross-check against rain-predicted attenuation detects force-up attacks with 98% probability within 1.5 s at 1% false alarms, but is structurally blind to force-down. The authors argue weather-aware band selection requires authenticated meteorological input.
- Spoofing the rainfall input alone dictates the victim's carrier frequency and communication range without channel transmission.
- Forced 73 GHz band cuts platoon reliable range to 38 m versus an 82 m baseline.
- Forced 5 GHz keeps 97% long-range reception but quadruples long-range latency to 12.5 ms.
- SINR cross-check detects force-up with 98% probability within 1.5 s at 1% false alarms; blind to force-down.
- Authors recommend authenticated meteorological input for weather-aware band selection.
- Vendors
- 3GPP
From the original article
1 min read at arxiv.orgConnected vehicles use millimeter-wave (mmWave) sidelinks for the data rates cooperative driving demands, and emerging designs select the carrier band from sensed rainfall. We show that this weather awareness is an attack surface: an adversary who spoofs only the rainfall input dictates the victim's carrier frequency, and through it its communication range, without transmitting on the channel.
By Rasheed Bello · arxiv.org
A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.