Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Akamai investigates Linode exposure to RCE CVE-2026-98432

Original title: Linode Security Incident

Hacker News · securityby lacoolj ()1 min read
Part of a story covered by 2 sourcesKernel TCP flaw CVE-2026-98432 draws Go advice and Linode responseMerged summary & timeline
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

The status page says mitigation is underway and the platform is being monitored, with no confirmed compromise.

Akamai said it is aware of the recently published remote code execution flaw CVE-2026-98432 and is investigating it in connection with Linode. The company said it is taking mitigation actions and monitoring the platform in parallel. A later update said subject-matter experts remain engaged and further mitigation updates will be posted. Customers who see impact are told to open a support ticket.

Unconfirmed: Akamai has not said whether Linode was compromised or whether the CVE is being exploited.

Key facts
  • The cited flaw is remote code execution CVE-2026-98432.
  • The first status note was posted October 30 at 18:10 UTC.
  • A follow-up at 21:18 UTC said the investigation was continuing.
  • Support is offered at cloud.linode.com/support.
Security assessment · AI, from the article

Impact: Remote code execution; Linode compromise not confirmed

What to do
  1. 1.Open a Linode support ticket if you are seeing impact from this issue.
Analyze CVE-2026-98432 with Vani AIImpact, affected versions, exploitation, mitigations and detection

Vulnerabilities mentioned

All
CVEVulnerabilityCVSSEPSSSignalsPublished
CVE-2026-98432
Use-after-free in Linux kernel IPv4 TCP options
9.8<1%PoC ×17

From the original article

1 min read at status.linode.com

We are continuing to investigate this issue. The appropriate subject matter experts are engaged. Subsequent updates around mitigation status will be posted as progress is made.

Hacker News · security

By lacoolj · status.linode.com

Read the full article at Hacker News · security

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.