Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

OpenAI releases GPT-6 Cyber, rated Critical for cyber capability

Original title: OpenAI releases GPT-6 Cyber, and promises this one stays within 'rules of engagement'

The Register · Securityby Jessica Lyons ()2 min read1
Part of a story covered by 14 sourcesOpenAI Releases GPT-6 Cyber AI ModelMerged summary & timeline
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Access starts with approved Daybreak Red customers after OpenAI said the model stayed in scope over 99 percent of the time.

OpenAI released GPT-6 Cyber, a cybersecurity model it says finds and exploits vulnerabilities better than GPT-5.6 Cyber and GPT-6 Astra while staying inside authorized scope. On ExploitGym it scored 48.5 percent versus 32.1 percent for GPT-5.6 Cyber. Researchers used it to report 81 new high-severity Firefox bugs and working exploits for 948 Linux kernel vulnerabilities, including 588 previously unknown. It is initially limited to approved Daybreak Red API and Codex customers.

Unconfirmed: OpenAI did not detail the 0.07 percent of cases that exceeded scope or confirm any real incidents.

Key facts
  • Only 0.07 percent of boundary tests went beyond the assigned task scope.
  • Mozilla has started fixing 81 previously unknown high-severity Firefox flaws.
  • Linux findings, with potential patches, were sent to maintainers for review.
  • OpenAI will later widen access and also offer GPT-5.6 Cyber to Daybreak Red customers.
  • Critical bug-bounty payouts on core products now reach up to $30,000 before bonuses.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

2 min read at theregister.com

The latest bug hunting model 'avoided exploiting out-of-scope services over 99 percent of the time', claims House of Altman

The Register · Security

By Jessica Lyons · theregister.com

Read the full article at The Register · Security

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.