Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

House House says an LLM helped fix a Big Walk bug

Original title: Big Walk used AI to fix a bug. Now the indie gaming world is having a reckoning.

Ars Technica · AIby Kyle Orland ()7 min read
Part of a story covered by 2 sourcesNineteen IGF jurors will not vote for generative-AI gamesMerged summary & timeline
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Nineteen IGF jurors say they will not vote for any game that uses generative AI after the disclosure.

House House said LLMs were used sparingly late in Big Walk development to work through a Unity bug that produced infinite-length shadows. The studio said the chatbot suggestion was heavily modified into about 10 lines, well under 0.1% of the code, and was disclosed to the Independent Games Festival because Valve does not require chatbot-use disclosure. Nineteen of more than 50 IGF jurors signed a statement declining to vote for any game using generative AI and urged a ban on AI-generated work.

Unconfirmed: A social media user claims the Unity bug was fixable without an LLM; that claim is unverified.

Key facts
  • The signed statement came from 19 members of a jury of more than 50.
  • House House said LLM use was well under 0.1% of Big Walk’s code.
  • The bug involved infinite-length shadows in the Unity engine.
  • Valve’s form covers AI-generated content, not chatbot efficiency gains.
  • Indie Game Awards previously rescinded Clair Obscur awards over AI textures.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

7 min read at arstechnica.com

Any amount of AI coding is too much for many Indie Game Festival judges.

Ars Technica · AI

By Kyle Orland · arstechnica.com

Read the full article at Ars Technica · AI

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.