Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Paper gives exact global minimax risk near nonidentification

Original title: Exact Global Minimax Risk near Nonidentification

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLby Kaiyue Yang ()1 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Conditions let one estimator match the leading constant uniformly; two models fix fifth- and sixth-order risk constants.

The paper studies squared-error estimation when a nuisance parameter is unidentified on a submodel but still affects a vanishing target. For higher-order profile expansions, it states conditions under which the largest critical-path minimax risk is the exact asymptotic minimax risk over the full parameter space. An estimator using calibration estimates, a local feature mean and an empirical recovery feature attains the leading constant with profile coordinates unknown. The conditions are checked in Gaussian logistic errors-in-variables regression and a replicated-network model.

Key facts
  • The constant is expressed through a bounded-normal decision problem.
  • The logistic errors-in-variables model uses one surrogate and two unknown variances.
  • That model yields a fifth-order global coefficient risk and its exact constant.
  • A degree-balanced network model yields sixth-order edge-contrast risk with unknown block proportions.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

We study squared-error estimation when a nuisance parameter is unidentified on a submodel but affects a target that vanishes there. For models with higher-order profile expansions, we give sufficient conditions under which the largest critical-path minimax risk is the exact asymptotic minimax risk over the full parameter space.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

By Kaiyue Yang · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.