Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

AI deployments are stretching enterprise security to its limits

Help Net Securityby @helpnetsecurity ()3 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · glm-5.3-flashSummaries by Vani AI

NetFoundry survey finds AI deployments will expand enterprise attack surfaces by 14%, with 90% of leaders worried about unapproved employee AI use.

NetFoundry's 2026 State of Secure AI Access survey found CISOs and CTOs expect AI deployments to grow attack surfaces by an average 14% within a year, with 90% concerned about employees using unapproved AI tools. Only 15% expressed high confidence that existing tools protect AI deployments, while non-human identities, static credentials and internet-facing APIs drive risk, and vulnerability exploitation now accounts for about 31% of breaches. Security reviews and network changes add an average eight days to AI deployments, and the median time to patch known exploited vulnerabilities has risen to 43 days.

Key facts
  • 90% of security leaders worry about employees using unapproved AI tools
  • Vulnerability exploitation now accounts for about 31% of breaches
  • More than half say security and compliance reviews add one to two weeks to AI deployments
  • Over one-third struggle to monitor AI agent activity, highest in finance
  • Machine identities and long-lived credentials are primary attack surface drivers
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

3 min read at helpnetsecurity.com

CISOs and CTOs expect AI deployments to increase their organizations’ attack surface by an average of 14% over the next year. Nearly all lack visibility into AI deployments, and 90% are concerned about employees using unapproved AI tools outside formal oversight, according to NetFoundry’s 2026 State of Secure AI Access survey.

Help Net Security

By @helpnetsecurity · helpnetsecurity.com

Read the full article at Help Net Security

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.