ZeroHour
Help Net Securitypublished ()ingested @zeljkazorz

Dirty Frag: Unpatched Linux vulnerability delivers root access

highVulnerability exploited in the wildimportance 60CVE-2026-43284CVE-2026-43500CVE-2026-31431

Vulnerabilities mentionedAll →

CVEVulnerabilityCVSSEPSSFlagsAffectedExposurePublished
CVE-2026-31431
Local Privilege Escalation (Copy Fail) in Linux Kernel algif_aead Interface

CVE-2026-31431 ('Copy Fail') is an incorrect resource transfer between spheres (CWE-669/CWE-1288) in the Linux kernel's algif_aead implementation of the AF_ALG userspace crypto interface, introduced roughly nine years ago (around 2017, per public reporting) when commit 72548b093ee3 switched AEAD operations to in-place handling even though the source and destination buffers come from different mappings. A local, unprivileged user can trigger the flaw by performing AEAD operations through the AF_ALG socket interface, causing the kernel to mishandle the copy of ciphertext and associated data. Successful exploitation provides a reliable local privilege escalation to root (C:H/I:H/A:H per the CVSS vector). Nearly every major Linux distribution and enterprise platform is exposed, including the kernel itself, Red Hat Enterprise Linux (including AUS, EUS, TUS and Update Services for SAP Solutions), OpenShift Container Platform, Amazon Linux, Ubuntu, Debian, openSUSE Leap, SUSE CaaS Platform, NixOS, and Linux-based products from Arista and Siemens. The flaw has public proof-of-concept code, a 99.9% EPSS score, and was added to CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on 2026-05-01, indicating exploitation in the wild (ransomware use is unknown).

Do: Patch by installing the kernel update for CVE-2026-31431 through your distribution's security channel (Red Hat Enterprise Linux including AUS/EUS/TUS/SAP channels, OpenShift, Amazon Linux, Ubuntu, Debian, openSUSE Leap, SUSE CaaS Platform, NixOS, and Arista/Siemens firmware/software as applicable) and reboot into the patched kernel; the data provides no fixed version numbers, so defer to vendor advisories. Because the flaw is in CISA's KEV catalog (added 2026-05-01) with a 99.9% EPSS score, prioritize internet-reachable and multi-user systems first and follow BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services. Check running kernel versions ('uname -r') and distribution advisory status to confirm you are on a fixed build.

7.8100% KEV PoC ×5
  • Linux kernel (algif_aead / AF_ALG crypto interface)
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux (including AUS, EUS, TUS, and Update Services for SAP Solutions)
  • Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform
  • +8 more
masshundreds of millions to billions of installations (servers, cloud instances, desktops, and Android/embedded devices running affected kernel generations)
CVE-2026-43284
Linux kernel ESP-in-UDP decrypts in place over shared splice pages (CWE-123)

CVE-2026-43284 is a write-what-where memory-safety flaw (CWE-123) in the Linux kernel's xfrm/ESP (IPsec) code: the IPv4/IPv6 UDP datagram send paths fail to mark pages spliced into a UDP skb with SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG when MSG_SPLICE_PAGES attaches pipe pages, so the ESP input path wrongly treats the packet as privately owned and decrypts it in place over memory the skb does not exclusively own. It is triggered when locally generated UDP traffic built from spliced pipe pages is processed by the ESP decryption path, typically in IPsec NAT-traversal (ESP-in-UDP, UDP port 4500) configurations; the in-place decrypt can corrupt or expose data still referenced by the pipe or other owners of those shared pages. A local, low-privileged attacker can thereby cause high-severity confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact that extends beyond the packet itself (CVSS 3.1: 8.8, scope changed); no remote or unauthenticated trigger is described. Any Linux system running a kernel with the vulnerable UDP splice and ESP-in-UDP paths is affected, most importantly IPsec VPN gateways and clients; the advisory lists no affected version ranges. No public proof-of-concept or confirmed in-the-wild exploitation is known (not on CISA KEV), but EPSS assigns a 93.2% probability of exploitation within 30 days (100th percentile), so patching should not be deferred.

Do: Apply your distribution's kernel security update containing the xfrm/esp fix for CVE-2026-43284 and reboot into the patched kernel, prioritizing IPsec VPN gateways and clients that use ESP-in-UDP NAT-T (UDP/4500). Until patched, restrict untrusted local users from sending splice-based (MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) UDP traffic through IPsec-protected paths, or temporarily avoid ESP-in-UDP encapsulation where feasible. Verify the fix via your vendor's package changelog, as the advisory does not name specific fixed version numbers.

8.893%
  • Linux kernel
mass≈1M+ Linux installations carry the vulnerable code in default distro kernels; hundreds of thousands of hosts expose IPsec NAT-T (UDP/4500) in public internet…
CVE-2026-43500
Out-of-bounds write in Linux kernel AF_RXRPC decryption enables root access

CVE-2026-43500 is a memory-corruption flaw in the Linux kernel's AF_RXRPC (rxrpc) subsystem: the DATA and RESPONSE packet handlers only copy received skbs to a linear buffer before decryption when the skb is marked cloned, so non-cloned skbs that still carry externally owned paged fragments (SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG, e.g. set by splice() into a UDP socket, or skbs with a frag_list) fall through to the in-place decryption path. In that path the shared fragment pages are bound directly into the AEAD/skcipher scatter-gather list via skb_to_sgvec(), so decryption writes into pages shared with other kernel or user contexts, causing out-of-bounds/write-what-where corruption (CWE-787/CWE-123), notably via the splice-into-UDP-socket loopback vector. A local low-privileged attacker who can get the machine to process such rxrpc packets can corrupt kernel memory and escalate to root (CVSS 3.1: 7.8 high, local vector, high confidentiality/integrity/availability impact). Affected systems are Linux kernels with the AF_RXRPC subsystem available — the transport used by the AFS/kAFS network filesystem — which mainstream distribution kernels ship as a module or built-in; no specific affected or fixed version ranges are provided in the data. It is not on CISA's KEV list and the CVE record lists no public PoC, but news reports describe a 'Dirty Frag' local privilege-escalation exploit giving root across major distributions and a released PoC, and EPSS puts the 30-day exploitation probability at about 93% (100th percentile).

Do: Apply the kernel update containing the rxrpc fix as soon as your distribution ships it — the fix extends the unshare gate to also unshare skbs with frag lists or shared fragments before in-place decryption; no fixed version numbers are given in the available data, so follow your distro's security advisory. Until patched, check whether rxrpc/AFS is in use (e.g. 'lsmod | grep rxrpc') and avoid or restrict local splice()-into-UDP/loopback AFS traffic on multi-user hosts.

7.893%
  • Linux kernel
mass≈1 billion+ Linux installations (mainstream distro kernels ship AF_RXRPC)
Full article616 words · extracted from helpnetsecurity.com · click to collapse

A week after Copy Fail, another Linux local privilege escalation vulnerability dubbed “Dirty Frag” has been revealed, along with a PoC exploit.

What is Dirty Frag

In effect, Dirty Frag refers to two flaws:

  • A xfrm-ESP Page-Cache Write vulnerability (CVE-2026-43284, aka Copy Fail 2.0), now patched in the Linux kernel, affects the modules supporting one of the protocols used for IPsec
  • A RxRPC Page-Cache Write vulnerability (CVE number reserved: CVE-2026-43500), currently unpatched, affects the modules that provide support for RxRPC, a protocol used for the AFS distributed file system.

Vulnerability researcher Hyunwoo Kim (aka “V4bel”) privately reported both flaws to the Linux kernel maintainers on April 29-30, 2026, and submitted patches for them to the mailing list for Linux kernel networking development (“netdev”).

On May 7, he submitted detailed information about the vulnerabilities and the exploit to the private, members-only mailing list used for coordinating security vulnerability disclosure across Linux distributions.

That same day, “an unrelated third party” published the details and the exploit for one of the flaws so, “after obtaining agreement from distribution maintainers,” Kim got the go-ahead to fully disclose Dirty Frag.

The consequence of the third-party leak during the embargo period is that CVE-2026-43500 has yet to be patched in the Linux kernel, and fixes haven’t been made available to users of various affected Linux distributions: Red Hat Enterprise Linux, AlmaLinux, Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, Arch Linux, CentOS, CloudLinux, Amazon Linux, and others.

Patches in the works, mitigations available

“An interesting factor of Dirty Frag is that chaining the two sub-vulnerabilities covers each other’s blind spots,” SANS ISC handler Yee Ching Tok explained.

“As described in [Hyunwoo Kim’s] write-up, neither the xfrm-ESP Page-Cache Write nor the RxRPC Page-Cache Write alone provides a sufficiently reliable primitive for full root escalation. However, when combined, the chained exploit achieves immediate root on most distributions.”

The various Linux distros are working furiously on implementing the fixes into new Linux kernel image packages and releasing them.

In the meantime, since the PoC exploit(s) are now publicly available, users and admins are advised to mitigate the risk of exploitation by:

  • Blacklisting / preventing the loading of the affected modules
  • Unloading them if they are in use

This action may affect workloads that depend on them, though.

After patched kernel packages are released, installed, and systems rebooted, the mitigations should be reversed.

It may be too soon to hear reports of Dirty Frag being leveraged by attackers, but they will undoubtedly surface soon enough: a PoC exploit for Copy Fail was published on April 29, and CISA added the flaw to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on May 1.

“If you have not yet addressed Copy Fail (CVE-2026-31431), now would be a good time to treat both vulnerabilities as a combined remediation effort, given their similarity and overlapping mitigation steps,” Tok noted.

UPDATE (May 11, 2026, 05:50 a.m. ET):

“Microsoft Defender is currently seeing limited in-the-wild activity where privilege escalation involving ‘su’ is observed, and which may be indicative of techniques associated with either ‘Dirty Frag’ or ‘Copy Fail’,” the company said.

The attackers are:

  • Achieving intial access via SSH
  • Spawning an interactive shell
  • Staging and executing of an ELF binary (./update) that triggers a privilege escalation via “su”
  • Modifying a GLPI LDAP authentication file (evidenced by a .swp file from vim)
  • Performing reconnaissance of the GLPI directory and system configuration, inspecting an exploit artifact
  • Accessing sensitive data and deleting/wiping PHP session files

Elastic Security Labs has published detection rules for these vulnerabilities, focused on the exploitation patterns.

Subscribe to our breaking news e-mail alert to never miss out on the latest breaches, vulnerabilities and cybersecurity threats. Subscribe here!

Text extracted automatically; images, tables and formatting may be missing. Original: https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2026/05/08/dirty-frag-linux-vulnerability-cve-2026-43284-cve-2026-43500/