Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

MEND: RL For Flow Models via Proximal Velocity Matching

Hugging Face daily papersby Shreshth Saini, Neil Birkbeck, Yilin Wang ()1 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

MEND post-trains flow models with proximal velocity matching, beating Flow-GRPO and ReFL in far fewer updates.

MEND is a reinforcement-learning method for reward post-training of flow models that uses proximal velocity matching instead of long KL-penalized reweighting or unchecked reward backpropagation. It caps rewards within each prompt group, proposes moves along the reward gradient only below the cap, and accepts a move only when the capped gain exceeds a quadratic displacement cost, then regresses onto the resulting velocity targets. In 100 updates it outperforms Flow-GRPO, which uses about 4,000 updates, on five of six evaluators at equal distance to base-model images, and under an equal budget it surpasses ReFL and DiffusionNFT, reaching PickScore 24.03 versus 23.92 and 23.43.

Key facts
  • Moves are accepted only when capped reward gain exceeds a displacement price.
  • Training uses no KL term, frozen reference, or advantage weights.
  • PickScore reaches 24.03 versus 23.92 for ReFL and 23.43 for DiffusionNFT.
  • The method applies to any flow backbone with a differentiable reward.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at huggingface.co

Reward post-training of flow models either reweights the model's own samples under a KL penalty or a frozen reference, often for thousands of updates, or backpropagates the reward and moves every sample without checking that the move is worth its size. We introduce MEND, a reinforcement learning method built on proximal velocity matching.

Hugging Face daily papers

By Shreshth Saini, Neil Birkbeck, Yilin Wang · huggingface.co

Read the full article at Hugging Face daily papers

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.