Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

23andMe successor settles California case for $6 million

Original title: 23andMe successor settles with California for $6 million over cybersecurity failings

The Record ()1 min read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

The pending deal covers a 2023 breach of nearly 7 million people’s data and preserves deletion and sample-destruction rights.

Chrome Holding Company, formerly known as 23andMe, agreed to pay California $6 million over allegations it failed to protect customers’ personal and genetic data. California Attorney General Rob Bonta said a 2023 breach exposed information belonging to nearly 7 million people. The deal is pending approval by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the Eastern District of Missouri. In July, 23andMe settled with 42 other state attorneys general for $18 million.

Unconfirmed: The $6 million settlement still needs approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the Eastern District of Missouri.

Key facts
  • In March 2025, 23andMe filed for bankruptcy and sold genetic data to TTAM Research Institute.
  • Anne Wojcicki leads both TTAM and Chrome Holding Company, the settling entity.
  • Bonta said bankruptcy does not let companies evade California privacy laws.
  • TTAM did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Security assessment · AI, from the article

Impact: Personal and genetic data of nearly 7 million people exposed

What to do
  1. 1.Affected consumers can delete their data and order destruction of genetic samples.
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at therecord.media

California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced a settlement under which 23andMe's successor will pay $6 million to resolve allegations that the company did not properly protect customers' data before a 2023 breach.

The Record

therecord.media

Read the full article at The Record

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.