Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Cybersecurity attention fades within months after a breach

Help Net Securityby Sinisa Markovic ()3 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · glm-5.3Summaries by Vani AI

ManageEngine survey of 700 breached organizations finds security attention fades within one to six months, while 91% still trust their posture.

A ManageEngine survey of 700 IT and security leaders in the US and Canada, all of whom had experienced a breach, found that 91% trust their current security posture and only 8% make security a permanent priority after an incident. 80% said post-breach focus lasts just one to six months, and nearly half made no wider changes after their incident. About two in three organizations using AI in security said they act on AI recommendations without additional verification. The report also flagged unclear ownership across security, IT, and business teams as a cause of delayed remediation.

Key facts
  • 91% of breached organizations trust current posture; only 8% sustain security as a priority.
  • 80% report post-incident attention fades within one to six months.
  • Two-thirds act on AI security recommendations without additional verification.
  • Unclear ownership across security, IT, and business teams delays remediation.
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

3 min read at helpnetsecurity.com

Cybersecurity attention often rises after an incident, then recedes as organizations return to their existing priorities and practices, according to a new ManageEngine survey of 700 IT and cybersecurity leaders in the US and Canada. (Source: ManageEngine) All of them had already been through a breach or incident. Still, 91% said they trust their organization’s current cybersecurity posture.

Help Net Security

By Sinisa Markovic · helpnetsecurity.com

Read the full article at Help Net Security

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.