VU#166125: Bisheng has authentication bypass vulnerabilities
CERT/CC warns Bisheng has an unpatched SSO authentication bypass that can grant super-admin access.
CERT/CC published VU#166125 covering three vulnerabilities in Bisheng, DataElement's open-source LLM application platform. CVE-2026-96679 lets unauthenticated attackers submit arbitrary usernames to a legacy SSO endpoint, receive a JWT, and potentially gain super-administrator access; the vendor has not patched it. CVE-2026-96681 is an IDOR that exposes other users' workflow configurations and is fixed in 3.0.0. CVE-2026-100156, fixed in 2.5.0, lets authenticated users abuse another user's assistant, run inferences billed to that user's provider, and leak configured tools and workflows.
- CVE-2026-96679 lets unauthenticated callers obtain JWTs via a legacy SSO endpoint and may create super-admins.
- CVE-2026-96681 is an IDOR exposing other users' workflow DSL, fixed in version 3.0.0.
- CVE-2026-100156 allows cross-user LLM credential and workflow abuse, fixed in 2.5.0.
- The SSO flaw remains unpatched; CERT/CC recommends disabling the endpoint and avoiding BISHENGPRO.
- Vendors
- DataElement
- Products
- Bisheng
- Organizations
- CERT/CCVoke CyberDataElement
Vulnerabilities mentioned
All| CVE | Vulnerability | CVSS | EPSS | Signals | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-100156 | — | — | — | ||
| CVE-2026-96679 | — | — | — | ||
| CVE-2026-96681 | — | — | — |
From the original article
3 min read at kb.cert.orgOverview Bisheng contains three vulnerabilities: a pre-authentication account takeover mechanism via a legacy single sign-on (SSO) endpoint; an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability that exposes cross-user workflow data; and prior to version 2. 5. 0, authenticated attackers could perform cross-user LLM credential abuse and data disclosure due to missing service-layer access checks.
kb.cert.org
A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.