Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

AdaRepair-Mem: Adaptive Experience Orchestration for Repository-Level Program Repair

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLby Z. C. Luo ()1 min read3 · 2 reads
AI summary · glm-5.3-flashSummaries by Vani AI

AdaRepair-Mem introduces coverage-, quality-, and stage-aware memory retrieval that improves LLM-based repository-level program repair on SWE-Bench.

The paper identifies three limitations in existing repository-level memory retrieval for LLM-based issue resolution: imbalanced episodic memory across repositories, non-monotonic gains from memory volume, and phase-misaligned memory accumulation. The proposed framework adds coverage-aware retrieval with cross-repository fallback, quality-aware selection ranking relevance, utility, specificity, and redundancy, and stage-aware routing across reproduction, localization, patch generation, refinement, and validation. On SWE-Bench-Lite and SWE-Bench-Verified it improves repair of under-covered repositories and reduces noisy retrieval.

Key facts
  • Coverage-aware retrieval falls back to cross-repository or repair-type memories
  • Quality-aware selection ranks memories by relevance, utility, specificity, redundancy
  • Stage-aware routing separates memory per repair phase
  • Evaluated on SWE-Bench-Lite and SWE-Bench-Verified
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Recent memory-augmented repository-level program repair methods reuse historical repair experiences to improve LLM-based issue resolution. However, our analysis reveals three limitations in existing repository-level memory retrieval. First, episodic memory is highly imbalanced across repositories, leaving low-resource repositories with little effective support.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

By Z. C. Luo · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.