Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Quantum MPC from random oracle requires Omega of circuit size communication

Original title: On the (Quantum) Communication Complexity of Secure MPC from a Random Oracle

arXiv cs.CRby Alexander Hoover ()1 min read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

New lower bounds show random oracle cannot reduce online communication in information-theoretic MPC and that quantum-accessible oracles with classical communication yield no savings.

Information-theoretic MPC protocols achieve specific online communication bounds with preprocessing or honest majority. These bounds are tight for inner products. A new Omega of circuit size lower bound holds even in the random oracle model for preprocessing MPC. An Omega of circuit size lower bound applies to honest-majority MPC relative to a random oracle. Quantum communication protocols cannot reduce communication compared to classical counterparts. A two-party protocol with quantum communication and post-quantum one-way functions achieves poly of lambda and log of circuit size communication.

Key facts
  • Lower bound for preprocessing MPC matches information-theoretic bound
  • New construction for degree-2 polynomials matches honest-majority bound
  • Quantum protocols offer no communication advantage
  • Blackbox protocols with o of circuit size quantum communication require Omega of cryptographic operations
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Information-theoretic MPC among $n$ parties with $t$ corruptions can securely evaluate a circuit $C$ with $O(|C| \cdot t/(n-t))$ online communication in the preprocessing model and $O(|C| \cdot t/(n-2t))$ communication in the honest majority setting. Damgård, Larsen and Nielsen (CRYPTO 2019) showed that both communication bounds are tight for inner products.

arXiv cs.CR

By Alexander Hoover · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.