Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Google DeepMind announces Gemini 4 Carbon frontier model

Original title: Gemini 4 Carbon: Our next frontier model

Google DeepMind ()4 min read3 · 1 read
Part of a story covered by 11 sourcesGoogle limits Gemini 4 Carbon to Fairwind cyber defendersMerged summary & timeline
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Limited access starts with cyber defenders under Fairwind, at Argon’s $2/$10 per million token prices.

Google DeepMind announced Gemini 4 Carbon, calling it its strongest model and a follow-on to Gemini 4 Argon from two weeks earlier. DeepMind says Carbon ranks first on Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0 at 59 and leads SEC-bench Pro, ExploitGym, and CWE-bench. Access starts this week for a subset of cyber defenders, with a gradual Fairwind rollout before developer, business, and consumer availability. Introductory pricing matches Argon.

Unconfirmed: Benchmark scores, uplifts, and safety gains are DeepMind’s own figures and are not independently confirmed here.

Key facts
  • Carbon scores 88.2% on SEC-bench Pro, 54.8% on ExploitGym, and 71.0% on CWE-bench.
  • DeepMind says secure-code success more than doubled versus Argon internally.
  • Successful cheating on Terminal-Bench 4.0 is reported at 0.0%, with attempts at 0.4%.
  • DeepMind says it is in the U.S. voluntary pre-release testing process.
  • Cached input tokens are priced at 95% off the input token price.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

4 min read at deepmind.google

Gemini 4 Carbon is our strongest model with state-of-the-art cybersecurity and long horizon capabilities. This content is generated by Google AI. Generative AI is experimental Today, we’re announcing the next frontier model: Gemini 4 Carbon, our strongest model with state-of-the-art cybersecurity and long horizon capabilities.

Google DeepMind

deepmind.google

Read the full article at Google DeepMind

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.