Proposed anti-Flock bills could spell trouble for license plate readers
US lawmakers proposed bills to restrict Flock Safety and other automated license-plate reader networks.
US lawmakers from both major parties have proposed bills to restrict automated license plate reader networks, with Flock Safety the main focus. The Stop Flock Abuse Act would require written approval and records for searches, supervisor audits, encryption, deletion of most vehicle-location data after ten days, no sharing or sale to non-government parties, no facial recognition, and US-only data storage. The Ban Flock Act would prohibit federal agencies from using ALPRs or their data, withhold federal grants from state and local governments that use them, and allow lawsuits. Neither proposal has been enacted.
- Stop Flock Abuse Act would require logged searches, audits, and 10-day deletion.
- Ban Flock Act would block federal ALPR use and related grants.
- Proposals would also bar facial recognition and sales to private parties.
- Both bills are proposals and are not yet law.
Full article709 words · extracted from malwarebytes.com · click to collapse
Automated license plate readers (ALPRs) are cameras that photograph passing vehicles, read their number plates, and typically log the time, location, and vehicle details. On their own, the images might be used to find a stolen car or locate a suspect.
But lately there have been a lot of concerns raised about the way they are used. The main worry is caused by what happens when many cameras feed data into a shared, searchable network: it can create a detailed record of where ordinary people travel.
Some agencies have already taken it upon themselves to act on these concerns, as well as those around inaccuracy. Data errors can have serious consequences. At a recent Senate hearing, Florida resident Lindsey Isaacs described being arrested and held for 13 days after data from an AI-enabled plate-reader system incorrectly implicated her in a fatal car crash.
As a result of all this, US lawmakers from both major political parties have introduced proposals aimed at restricting automatic license plate reader networks.
Most of the reasons brought up are about Flock Safety, one of the largest suppliers of these systems in the United States, but they would apply more broadly to other ALPR vendors as well.
Flock says it deploys only 120,000 cameras operating across the country, while a researcher cited by the Senate described a much larger network of connected devices and cameras. The exact size may be disputed, but the central concern is clear: Data from a camera in one location can potentially be searched by an agency elsewhere.
Two different approaches
Reportedly, there are two different proposed laws in the making, while Flock says it supports a legal framework for license-plate readers and argues that the technology can improve public safety when it is used with strong oversight and accountability.
The first proposal, the Stop Flock Abuse Act, doesn’t aim to banish ALPR systems outright, it would create rules for how government agencies and vendors can use them.
Among other measures, the bill would require written approval and a record for every search, regular supervisor audits, encryption, and deletion of most vehicle-location data after ten days. It would also prohibit sharing or selling the data to non-governmental third parties, prevent ALPR networks from incorporating facial-recognition technology, and require data to stay in the US.
A second proposal, the Ban Flock Act, takes a much harder line. It would prohibit US federal agencies from using ALPRs or accessing data they collect. It would also withhold federal grant money from state and local governments that use ALPR systems and allow people to sue the federal government if their rights are violated through ALPR deployment.
Both bills are proposals, not enacted laws. In the US system, each would need to pass both the House of Representatives and the Senate in matching form, then be signed by the President.
Going forward
There is no guarantee either bill will receive a vote, let alone become law. But their introduction shows that ALPR technology is moving from a local procurement issue to a national privacy and civil-liberties debate.
License plate data may seem less sensitive than phone-location data, but a long enough record can reveal a person’s routines, relationships, medical visits, religious activity, or attendance at protests. The debate is therefore not just about cameras on streets to fight crime and find criminals, it is about whether governments and private vendors should be able to build searchable records of everyday movement.
So for consumers, the key question is not only whether a camera is installed on a street or near a business. It is also how long the resulting data is retained, who can search it, whether those searches are logged and reviewed, whether the information can be shared beyond the original agency, and what recourse exists when the system is wrong or abused.
Your name, address, and phone number may already be for sale.
Data brokers collect and sell your personal details to anyone willing to pay. Malwarebytes Personal Data Remover finds them and gets your information removed, then keeps watch so it stays that way.
About the author
Was a Microsoft MVP in consumer security for 12 years running. Can speak four languages. Smells of rich mahogany and leather-bound books.