Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Snort 3 control socket lets low-privilege local users run commands

Original title: Open Source Snort 3 Control Channel Socket Arbitrary Command Execution Vulnerability

Cisco Security Advisories ()
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Missing socket authentication also allows reading and writing Snort 3 process memory; Cisco has updates and no workaround.

A flaw in the Open Source Snort 3 control channel socket lets an authenticated local attacker with low privileges run arbitrary commands as the Snort 3 process user. The socket does not authenticate local connections. A successful exploit can also read and write Snort 3 process memory. Cisco has released software updates and says there are no workarounds.

Unconfirmed: The excerpt does not give a CVE ID, affected versions, or a fixed version.

Key facts
  • The attacker must already be a local user with low privileges.
  • Exploitation is by connecting to the Snort 3 control channel socket.
  • Impact includes command execution and process-memory read and write.
  • Cisco says no workaround addresses the vulnerability.
Security assessment · AI, from the article

Impact: Local user runs commands and reads or writes process memory

ProductAffected
Cisco Open Source Snort 3—
What to do
  1. 1.Install the Cisco software updates for Open Source Snort 3.
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

A vulnerability in the control channel socket implementation of Open Source Snort 3 could allow an authenticated, local attacker with low privileges to execute arbitrary commands as the Snort 3 process user. This vulnerability is due to a lack of authentication when a local user connects to the Snort control channel socket.

Cisco Security Advisories

sec.cloudapps.cisco.com

Read the full article at Cisco Security Advisories

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.