Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Yalda Embedding released as a 595.8M Persian retrieval model

Original title: Yalda-Embedding: Open Development of a Competitive Persian Retrieval Model

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLby Yalda Taheri ()1 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Adapted from Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B on more than one million pairs, it scores 0.5488 macro-average on eight FaMTEB tasks.

Authors present Yalda Embedding, a Persian dense retrieval model with 595.8 million parameters, adapted from Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B using more than one million query-document pairs. On eight FaMTEB tasks it posts the highest macro-average among evaluated 0.6B models at 0.5488, beating Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B and F2LLM-v2-0.6B on every task. It trails Qwen3-Embedding-4B by 0.0075 in macro-average while winning four tasks and tying one. Distillation from F2LLM-v2-8B lifts the mean from 0.4813 to 0.5488. Weights, code, and the pairwise dataset are released.

Unconfirmed: FaMTEB scores are the authors' own evaluation, not an independent leaderboard.

Key facts
  • Contrastive fine-tuning alone was modest and regressed on two tasks.
  • Distillation improved all eight tasks without a larger inference model.
  • Gains cover hard-negative tasks though hard negatives were not mined.
  • The release includes a teacher-embedded copy of the dataset.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Despite advances in multilingual text representations, effective dense retrieval for Persian remains constrained by the limited availability of language-specific training resources and compact embedding models. We present Yalda Embedding, a 595. 8-million-parameter Persian retrieval model adapted from Qwen3-Embedding-0.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

By Yalda Taheri · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.