Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

RobResilience: Implementing and Evaluating a Resilience Framework for Cyber-Physical Embodied Systems

arXiv cs.CRby Gysella Imrell ()1 min read3 · 1 read
AI summary · glm-5.3Summaries by Vani AI

RobResilience implements a runtime resilience framework for robots in Webots/ROS2, evaluating tolerable disruption, degradation, and mitigation feasibility across eight attack scenarios.

The paper implements a formal resilience framework for embodied cyber-physical systems using a PR2 robot and ROS2 in a Webots simulation. At runtime it evaluates three predicates — tolerable disruption (δ), tolerable degradation (γ), and mitigation feasibility (μ) — over a compromised device set derived from IDS confidence scores, triggering mitigation strategies when resilience is lost. Eight attack scenarios systematically covering the full predicate state space confirm runtime behavior matches theoretical definitions. The work addresses 'graceful failure paralysis,' where autonomous systems cannot distinguish safe degraded states from catastrophic hazards during attacks.

Key facts
  • Runtime predicates: tolerable disruption, degradation, and mitigation feasibility from IDS scores
  • Implemented on PR2 robot with ROS2 in Webots simulation
  • Eight attack scenarios cover full predicate state space
  • Addresses inability to distinguish safe degraded states from hazards
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

In embodied cyber-physical systems, active cyberattacks pose an immediate threat not just to data, but to physical integrity and human safety. While existing security approaches excel at detection, they lack the runtime mechanisms to determine whether a disruption is tolerable or if performance degradation remains within safe operational bounds.

arXiv cs.CR

By Gysella Imrell · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.