Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Mistral releases Timestral time-series foundation models

Original title: Timestral: Mistral release time-series foundation models

Hacker News · AIby groar ()6 min read3 · 1 read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Mistral says its 209M model ranks first on GIFT-Eval, TIME and fev-bench while using about two-thirds the parameters of the prior leader.

Mistral released Timestral, a four-size family of time-series foundation models from 5M to 209M parameters, for probabilistic multivariate forecasts with past and known-future covariates. The company says the 209M model ranks first among pretrained zero-shot entries on GIFT-Eval, TIME and fev-bench from a single checkpoint, and that every size sits on its accuracy-versus-size frontier. Inference is described as CPU-only, with Mistral Forge offered for domain fine-tuning. Results are attributed to Mistral and described as submitted to the GIFT-Eval and TIME leaderboards.

Unconfirmed: Benchmark ranks, parameter comparisons and latency figures are Mistral's own reported results.

Key facts
  • Sizes are 5M, 28M, 123M and 209M parameters, sharing one architecture.
  • Mistral says the 28M model beats Chronos-2 on GIFT-Eval and TIME.
  • On an 8-thread server CPU, one-day forecasts take 10 ms at 5M and 140 ms at 209M.
  • The 123M model is within 0.2% of the 209M score at three quarters of its latency, Mistral says.
  • Models accept categorical covariates and can run beside Mistral language models in agent workflows.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

6 min read at mistral.ai

Timestral, Mistral’s first family of time-series foundation models, delivers state-of-the-art probabilistic, multivariate forecasts with just 209M parameters, outperforming larger models on key benchmarks while supporting past and future covariates.

Hacker News · AI

By groar · mistral.ai

Read the full article at Hacker News · AI

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.