Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Go will reject certificate chains with eight distrusted SPKIs

Original title: Go will reject certificate chains containing eight distrusted SPKIs

Lobsters · securityby github.com via mendy ()
Part of a story covered by 2 sourcesGo to reject certificate chains with eight distrusted SPKIsMerged summary & timeline
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

A reader of the change says 16 certificates, all from eMudhra, appear to match.

A Go commit will reject certificate chains that contain eight distrusted subject public key identifiers. A commenter who downloaded CA data from CCADB says the change appears to affect 16 certificates, all from eMudhra, and posted that list as a gist. The feed names no Go version, CVE, or the SPKIs themselves.

Unconfirmed: The count of 16 eMudhra certificates is one commenter's reading of CCADB data, not a Go project statement.

Key facts
  • The commenter counted 16 certificates, all issued by eMudhra.
  • CA certificate data was taken from ccadb.org.
  • The compiled list is published as a GitHub gist.
Security assessment · AI, from the article

Impact: Chains with eight distrusted SPKIs will be rejected

ProductAffected
Go—
What to do
  1. 1.Check whether chains include the eMudhra certificates listed in the gist.
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

Indicators of compromise

auto-extracted · verify before use · export allAll
TypeIndicatorContext
md5ff7a9fd00339260b4d2dbdcb0f489b57a. I complied the list here https://gist.github.com/mendymm/ff7a9fd00339260b4d2dbdcb0f489b57 Comments

From the original article

I downloaded the CA cert data from https://www. ccadb. org/resources and it seems to be affecting 16 certs, all from eMudhra.

Lobsters · security

By github.com via mendy · github.com

Read the full article at Lobsters · security

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.