Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

BrainWideBench: Benchmarking large-scale pretraining and across-animal transfer in multi-region neural recordings

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLby Alexandre Andre ()1 min read1
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

BrainWideBench tests whether pretrained neural representations transfer across mice, behavior, dynamics, and anatomy.

BrainWideBench is a benchmark for across-animal transfer on multi-region neural recordings, built on the International Brain Laboratory Brainwide Map from 139 mice and 276 brain regions. It evaluates whether pretrained representations support behavior decoding, prediction of masked or future neural activity, and recovery of anatomical organization, including finetuning and zero-shot transfer to unseen animals. Pretraining beats matched single-session baselines, but gains depend on alignment between pretraining and downstream tasks, and no method performs uniformly across all three suites.

Key facts
  • Benchmark uses IBL Brainwide Map data from 139 mice across 276 brain regions.
  • Three suites test behavior decoding, neural prediction, and anatomical recovery.
  • Pretraining beats single-session baselines, but no method wins all suites.
  • Zero-shot transfer to unseen animals remains uneven and objective-dependent.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Advances in large-scale neural recording have made it possible to collect data across many animals and distributed brain regions, raising the question of whether this scale can be exploited to learn general-purpose neural representations transferable across diverse downstream tasks. Yet, progress toward this goal has been limited by fragmented evaluation protocols and a narrow focus on individual task domains.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

By Alexandre Andre · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.