Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour
Advisorymedium

USN-8814-1: Octavia vulnerabilities

Ubuntu Security Notices ()3 · 1 read
AI summary · glm-5.3Summaries by Vani AI

Ubuntu patches multiple OpenStack Octavia flaws allowing authenticated load-balancer owners to inject arbitrary HAProxy configuration directives.

Ubuntu Security Notice USN-8814-1 fixes several vulnerabilities in OpenStack Octavia. CVE-2026-94572 stems from improper validation of TLS cipher string fields in the Amphora provider driver, and CVE-2026-94571 from improper validation of L7 policy redirect URL fields; both allow an authenticated attacker who owns a load balancer to inject arbitrary HAProxy configuration directives. A third flaw involves incorrect quality of service policy authorization handling by authenticated attackers. No exploitation is mentioned in the notice.

Key facts
  • Octavia Amphora driver fails to validate TLS cipher and L7 redirect URL fields
  • Authenticated load-balancer owners can inject arbitrary HAProxy configuration directives
  • QoS policy authorization also handled incorrectly
  • Fixed via Ubuntu security notice USN-8814-1
Analyze CVE-2026-94572 with Vani AIImpact, affected versions, exploitation, mitigations and detection

Vulnerabilities mentioned

All
CVEVulnerabilityCVSSEPSSSignalsPublished
CVE-2026-94571
HAProxy Config Injection via L7 Policy Redirect Fields in OpenStack Octavia
9.4—
CVE-2026-94572
HAProxy Config Injection in OpenStack Octavia Amphora Driver via tls_ciphers
9.4—

From the original article

It was discovered that Octavia did not properly validate TLS cipher string fields in the Amphora provider driver. An authenticated attacker who owns a TLS-enabled load balancer could possibly use this issue to inject arbitrary HAProxy configuration directives. (CVE-2026-94572) It was discovered that Octavia did not properly validate L7 policy redirect URL fields in the Amphora provider driver.

Ubuntu Security Notices

ubuntu.com

Read the full article at Ubuntu Security Notices

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.