Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

WebMaze steers LLM web scanners into decoy worlds

Original title: WebMaze: Defending Against LLM-Powered Web Scanners with Functionality-Coupled Deception

arXiv cs.CRby Pengfei Zeng ()1 min read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

On 12 applications and three scanners, decoy pages averaged 93.0% of distinct pages requested per run.

The paper studies six LLM-based web scanners and presents WebMaze, a defense that keeps genuine application behavior while sending scanners into generated decoy worlds. Functionality-coupled traps on real pages open view-specific interactive decoys built from existing application views. Under a default no-disclosure setting, decoy pages made up an average of 93.0% of distinct pages requested per run across 12 web applications and three scanners. Scanners still mostly explored decoys after being told about the mechanism and told to avoid them.

Key facts
  • The study covered six LLM-based scanners before designing the defense.
  • Traps blend into genuine components and do not change real functionality.
  • The reported test used 12 web applications and three scanners.
  • Decoy pages averaged 93.0% of distinct pages requested per run.
  • Disclosure and avoidance instructions did not stop predominant decoy exploration.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Large language models (LLMs) have enabled more effective vulnerability scanning of web applications. However, these capabilities also make it significantly easier for attackers to automate cyberattacks on the web. In this work, we investigate how to divert malicious LLM-based web scanning, with preservation of genuine functionality as a deployment requirement.

arXiv cs.CR

By Pengfei Zeng · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.