Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Senior engineers are spending their week cleaning up AI-generated code

Help Net Securityby @helpnetsecurity ()3 min read3
AI summary · glm-5.3-flashSummaries by Vani AI

New Relic study finds AI-generated code doubles critical runtime issues, with senior engineers losing a third of their week to fixes.

A New Relic survey of U.S. technology leaders reports AI now writes the majority of shipped code, with senior SRE and DevOps engineers spending up to a third of their week triaging and refactoring it. A large majority of organizations had at least one AI-related production failure in the past six months, and roughly three in ten saw newly introduced security vulnerabilities. AI-generated code showed nearly twice as many critical runtime issues as peer-reviewed human-authored code, with gaps concentrated in edge cases, concurrency, deprecated APIs, and complex state changes. Most teams now prompt AI tools to embed logs and traces directly into generated code.

Key facts
  • AI code passes review on style but fails on edge cases, concurrency, and deprecated APIs
  • About 30% of organizations saw new security vulnerabilities from AI code within six months
  • SRE and DevOps engineers lose up to a third of their work week fixing AI output
  • Near-unanimous support for observability; many prompt AI to build in telemetry
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

3 min read at helpnetsecurity.com

At most U. S. technology companies, machines now write the bulk of the code that ships each week.

Help Net Security

By @helpnetsecurity · helpnetsecurity.com

Read the full article at Help Net Security

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.