Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Near-zero embeddings stall gated model training

Original title: Near-Zero Token Embeddings Silently Stall Training in Gated Sequence Models

Hugging Face daily papersby Xin Liu, Boyuan Sun, Yuxin Wang ()1 min read1
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Untied gated checkpoints contain near-zero embeddings that amplify gradients 30+ orders of magnitude and trigger FP32 clipping, freezing rows in 20% of Telugu pretraining steps.

Among 291 surveyed open-weight repos, 52.6% of untied gated models have reachable embeddings below 10^{-6}. Near-zero tokens from rare or template inputs cause gradient amplification up to 35 orders of magnitude, leading to RMSNorm floor issues and batch gradient zeroing. Remedies are GroupClip for released checkpoints and GateFloor for pretraining.

Key facts
  • 52.6% of untied gated checkpoints affected
  • Gradient amplification exceeds 30 orders of magnitude
  • GateFloor reduces near-zero gradients by 28 orders
  • Perplexity remains comparable to baseline
  • GroupClip heals triggered rows in one step
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at huggingface.co

Among 291 surveyed open-weight language model repositories (280 distinct embedding tables), 52. 6% of untied gated and hybrid checkpoints (20/38) contain reachable input embeddings with norms below 10^{-6}, compared with 0% of weight-tied models. Such near-zero rows can arise during pretraining when unseen rare or template tokens receive zero input gradients while AdamW weight decay shrinks untied embeddings.

Hugging Face daily papers

By Xin Liu, Boyuan Sun, Yuxin Wang · huggingface.co

Read the full article at Hugging Face daily papers

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.