Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Risk-Sensitive Non-Parametric Bandits Match Classical Regret Bounds

Original title: Risk-Sensitive Non-Parametric and Kernel Bandits

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLby Devdan Dey ()1 min read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Non-parametric CPT bandits incur no additional order-wise regret cost compared to standard bandits under Cumulative Prospect Theory.

The paper studies non-parametric bandits with arm evaluations via Cumulative Prospect Theory instead of expected reward in continuous spaces with arm-dependent noise. The optimistic NPCB algorithm decouples mean estimation from CPT decisions, proving matching regret bounds. Extensions to unknown noise CDFs and kernel bandits retain comparable rates up to log factors.

Key facts
  • CPT regret order matches classical non-parametric bandits
  • Proof for unknown noise CDFs adds distributional Eluder dimension cost
  • Information-gain bounds for kernels match risk-neutral rates
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

We study non-parametric bandits in which arms are evaluated using Cumulative Prospect Theory (CPT) rather than expected reward. We consider continuous action spaces with arm-dependent noise and propose Non-Parametric CPT Bandits ($\mathtt{NPCB}$), an optimistic algorithm that decouples mean estimation from CPT-based decision-making.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

By Devdan Dey · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.