Machine learning pioneer Michael I. Jordan dismantles AI doom rhetoric as "grand moralizing performance"
Michael I. Jordan dismisses AI doom rhetoric as science fiction and calls data-center spending an unproven bet.
Machine-learning pioneer Michael I. Jordan, now heading a markets-and-learning chair at France's Inria, told Libération that warnings about existential AI threats are science fiction. He described company calls for regulation and high-profile resignations, including Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon, as moralizing performance. He criticized Geoffrey Hinton's superintelligence argument, was more favorable toward Yoshua Bengio's safety work, and framed an OpenAI-agent incident involving Hugging Face as bad engineering rather than self-aware agents. He also called massive data-center investment an enormous bet whose payoff is unknown, arguing specialized local knowledge and open-weight models may matter more.
- Jordan calls existential-risk warnings and superintelligence talk science fiction.
- He criticizes AI-company regulation demands and researcher resignations as theater.
- He rejects Geoffrey Hinton's brain-copying path to superintelligence.
- He calls trillion-dollar data-center spending an unproven bet versus open-weight models.
- Organizations
- UC BerkeleyInriaAnthropicOpenAIHugging Face
- Countries
- United StatesFrance
From the original article
4 min read at the-decoder.com
Michael I. Jordan, described by Science as "the most influential computer scientist," considers warnings about superintelligence pure science fiction. He calls the resignations of young AI researchers a "grand moralizing performance" and companies' demands for regulation "theater."
By Matthias Bastian · the-decoder.com
A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.