Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

MobileInject: Evaluating Reasoning-to-Action Security of MLLM-Based Mobile Agents under Cross-Modal Consistency Injection

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLby Songping Wang ()1 min read4 · 4 reads
AI summary · grok-4.7-buildSummaries by Vani AI

MobileInject benchmarks MLLM mobile agents against multimodal injection across 108 risk instances, finding broad vulnerability.

MobileInject is a benchmark for multimodal injection against MLLM-based mobile agents that perceive, reason, and act on smartphones. It covers 11 scenarios, nine security-risk categories, and 108 executable risk instances, and introduces Cross-Modal Consistency Injection, Multi-Role Collaborative Deception, and Reasoning-Camouflage Injection. Experiments find broad vulnerability, with many failures caused by reasoning hijacking at early stages. A Reasoning Security Diagnosis Framework is included for fine-grained failure analysis.

Key facts
  • Benchmark covers 11 scenarios and 108 executable risk instances.
  • Cross-modal consistency injection exploits agreement across modalities.
  • Added attacks target trust manipulation and reasoning hijacking.
  • Many failures begin with early-stage reasoning hijacking.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Multimodal large language model (MLLM)-based mobile agents are rapidly evolving from conversational assistants into autonomous systems that perceive, reason over, and act on smartphone environments. This capability also exposes a new security risk: adversaries can embed malicious objectives in cross-application mobile content and steer agent behavior through indirect multimodal injection.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

By Songping Wang · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.