August 2026 CVE Landscape
Insikt Group catalogs 73 high-impact August 2026 CVEs (43 Very Critical), including PaperCut, Zimbra, and Metabase flaws actively exploited or weaponized.
Recorded Future's Insikt Group identified 73 high-impact vulnerabilities in August 2026, 43 rated Very Critical, spanning 45 vendors with Microsoft accounting for roughly 11%. 31 vulnerabilities surfaced via CISA's KEV catalog, with others validated via open sources, vendor telemetry, and honeypot data. New Nuclei detection templates were released for CVE-2025-62593 (Ray), CVE-2026-72898 (Metabase), and CVE-2026-9198 (IBM Langflow). The report also highlights two AI-assisted operations: UAT-10147 exploited Zimbra, AjaxPro, Nacos, and Telerik servers before using DeepAudit and PentestGPT post-compromise, while a separate Chinese-speaking actor weaponized Hermes Agent and DeepSeek in a failed attempt.
- 73 high-impact CVEs identified, 43 rated Very Critical, down 14% from July
- 31 vulnerabilities added to CISA KEV catalog; Microsoft accounted for ~11% of all CVEs
- Nuclei templates published for Ray (CVE-2025-62593), Metabase (CVE-2026-72898), IBM Langflow (CVE-2026-9198)
- UAT-10147 used AI tooling (DeepAudit, PentestGPT) post-compromise against Zimbra and other servers
- Prior PaperCut CVEs CVE-2026-81578 and CVE-2026-82078 tied to AI-orchestrated campaign
Vulnerabilities mentionedAll →
| CVE | Vulnerability | CVSS | EPSS | Flags | Affected | Exposure | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-62593 | Actively Exploited Browser-Based RCE in Ray AI Compute Engine Ray, the open-source AI compute engine, is vulnerable to a critical remote code execution flaw (CVE-2025-62593, CWE-94/CWE-352) in versions prior to 2.52.0, caused by an insufficient guard against browser-based attacks: the software distinguishes browser traffic only by checking that the User-Agent header starts with 'Mozilla', but the fetch specification allows that header to be modified. An attacker can combine DNS rebinding with a crafted User-Agent so that a developer's Firefox or Safari browser silently sends malicious requests to locally running Ray services after the developer visits an attacker-controlled website or is served a malicious advertisement (malvertising). Successful exploitation yields full remote code execution on the machine running Ray, with high confidentiality, integrity and availability impact reflected in the CVSS 4.0 score of 9.4. Affected users are developers running Ray as a development tool on any version before 2.52.0, which is the fixed release. The flaw is being actively exploited in the wild: CISA added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on 2026-08-17, a public proof of concept is available in the project's GitHub security advisory (GHSA-q279-jhrf-cc6v), and EPSS estimates a 16.9% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days. Do: Upgrade Ray to version 2.52.0 or later immediately, in line with CISA KEV and BOD 26-04 patching requirements. Until patched, avoid browsing untrusted websites (including ad-serving pages) while Ray development services are running, and restrict network access to locally running Ray services. Focus triage on machines where developers use Firefox or Safari alongside Ray, and hunt for signs of compromise since the flaw is actively exploited. | 9.4 | 17% | KEV PoC |
| largeTens of thousands of developer machines/environments running vulnerable Ray (estimate) | |
| CVE-2026-3395 | A flaw has been found in MaxSite CMS up to 109.1. A flaw has been found in MaxSite CMS up to 109.1. This impacts the function eval of the file application/maxsite/admin/plugins/editor_markitup/preview-ajax.php of the component MarkItUp Preview AJAX Endpoint. Executing a manipulation can lead to code injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. Upgrading to version 109.2 will fix this issue. This patch is called 08937a3c5d672a242d68f53e9fccf8a748820ef3. You should upgrade the affected component. The code maintainer was informed beforehand about the issues. He reacted very fast and highly professional. NVD description · AI analysis pending | 5.5 | 4% |
| — | ||
| CVE-2026-59800 | 9Router before 0.4.44 contains an OS command injection vulnerability in the unauthenticated POST /api/tunnel/tailscale-install endpoint (this route is not cover 9Router before 0.4.44 contains an OS command injection vulnerability in the unauthenticated POST /api/tunnel/tailscale-install endpoint (this route is not covered by the dashboard middleware matcher, so no authorization check is applied). The sudoPassword field from the request body is written to the stdin of a 'sudo -S sh' child process. When sudo does not prompt for a password (the process runs as root, NOPASSWD is configured, or a recent sudo timestamp cache exists), the sudoPassword value is interpreted by sh as a shell command, allowing a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary OS commands. Exploitation evidence was first observed by the Shadowserver Foundation on 2026-07-04 (UTC). NVD description · AI analysis pending | 9.2 | 2% | — | — | ||
| CVE-2026-72898 | Unauthenticated SQL Injection in Metabase Grants Admin Access CVE-2026-72898 is a critical SQL injection flaw (CWE-89, CVSS 4.0 score of 10) in Metabase, a widely used open-source business intelligence platform. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can send crafted input to the '/reset_password' database endpoint to inject arbitrary SQL into the underlying database. Successful exploitation grants the attacker administrator access to the connected Metabase instance, with confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts rated high in the CVSS 4.0 vector. Any organization running an affected Metabase instance, particularly one exposed to the internet, is at risk. The flaw is a zero-day being exploited in the wild, was added to CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on 2026-08-11, and carries a 94.2% EPSS probability of exploitation within 30 days (100th percentile). Do: Upgrade promptly to the fixed Metabase release identified in the vendor's security advisory (no version numbers were provided in the available data), as the flaw is being exploited in the wild and is on CISA's KEV list under BOD 26-04. Until patched, restrict internet access to Metabase and limit reachability of the '/reset_password' endpoint to trusted networks. Hunt for compromise by reviewing access logs for anomalous requests to the reset-password endpoint and checking for unexpected administrator accounts or changed admin credentials. | 10.0 | 94% | KEV PoC |
| large≈10k–50k internet-exposed Metabase instances (tens of thousands) | |
| CVE-2026-82078 +1 in the same advisory: …81578 | Unsafe Reflection RCE in PaperCut NG/MF, Chained with Auth Bypass in Attacks CVE-2026-82078 is an unsafe dynamic class loading flaw (unsafe reflection, CWE-470) in the database connection utilities of PaperCut NG and PaperCut MF: the software instantiates a database driver class based on a configurable driver name without validating it against an allowlist of approved drivers. An attacker who can manipulate system configuration parameters can point that setting at classes of their choosing, causing the server to execute arbitrary Java bytecode residing on the application classpath in the security context of the PaperCut server process. On its own the issue is rated 9.4 (Critical) with high privileges required, but when chained with the companion authentication bypass CVE-2026-81578 it yields unauthenticated remote code execution on the print-management server. All PaperCut NG and MF deployments are in scope; affected version ranges were not specified in the available data, so administrators should consult PaperCut's advisory for fixed versions. The flaw is confirmed exploited in the wild as a zero-day: it was added to CISA's KEV catalog on 2026-08-31, and public reporting describes an AI-orchestrated campaign that compromised PaperCut servers at roughly 395 organizations (~440 servers), with EPSS currently at 1.7% (76th percentile). Do: Upgrade PaperCut NG and MF to the patched release specified in PaperCut's security advisory (exact fixed versions were not provided in this data), prioritizing internet-exposed print servers; the KEV listing means agencies must remediate per CISA BOD 26-04 or discontinue/mitigate per its cloud-service guidance. Restrict the PaperCut web interface from direct internet exposure (VPN/allowlist), review administrator accounts and database driver configuration for tampering, and hunt for post-exploitation activity, since this flaw is being actively chained with the authentication bypass CVE-2026-81578. | 9.4 group max | 2% | KEV |
| mass≈100,000+ organizations / plausibly millions of end users (vendor-cited install base); tens of thousands of on-prem servers with a smaller but significant… | |
| CVE-2026-9198 | Unauthenticated RCE Chain in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0-1.10.0 IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 contains an unauthenticated code-injection flaw (CWE-94) that can be chained into full remote code execution. An attacker with network access first calls /api/v1/auto_login, which mints a SUPERUSER token to any caller without authentication, then calls /api/v1/validate/code, which executes attacker-supplied code via exec() on the Langflow host. Successful exploitation yields full control of the affected deployment, with high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CVSS 3.1: 9.8, network-exploitable with no privileges or user interaction required). Anyone running IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0-1.10.0 is affected, especially default deployments reachable from untrusted networks. CISA added the flaw to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on 2026-08-04, confirming active exploitation; EPSS estimates a 60.6% probability of exploitation within 30 days (99th percentile), and ransomware use is unknown. Do: Upgrade IBM Langflow OSS to a release newer than 1.10.0 per IBM's ([email protected]) security advisory, as required under CISA's BOD 26-04 guidance for KEV entries; if mitigations are unavailable, discontinue use of the product per BOD 26-04. Until patched, restrict network access to the /api/v1/auto_login and /api/v1/validate/code endpoints (e.g., firewall rules or reverse-proxy controls) and avoid exposing the instance directly to the internet. Because exploitation is confirmed, review access logs for requests to these endpoints and signs of unauthenticated SUPERUSER token issuance or unexpected code execution. | 9.8 | 61% | KEV |
| largelikely tens of thousands of self-hosted or internet-exposed deployments (estimate) |
Full article1,707 words · extracted from recordedfuture.com · click to collapse
In August 2026, Insikt Group® identified 73 high-impact vulnerabilities that should be prioritized for remediation, 43 of which had a Very Critical Recorded Future Risk Score. This represents a 14% decrease from last month. 31 of these vulnerabilities were surfaced through the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, 32 were reported in open sources and validated by Insikt Group, seven were sourced through security vendor telemetry, and three were exclusively surfaced through honeypot data.
The 73 vulnerabilities in this blog affected products from 45 vendors, with Microsoft accounting for approximately 11% of the vulnerabilities. The remaining exposure spanned remote monitoring and management, virtualization, application delivery, collaboration, artificial intelligence, developer, analytics, identity, operational technology, content management, network edge, video surveillance, and endpoint technologies.
In August, Insikt Group created Nuclei templates to detect CVE-2025-62593 (Ray), CVE-2026-72898 (Metabase), and CVE-2026-9198 (IBM Langflow). Each of these vulnerabilities is featured in this blog. Additionally, Insikt Group had previously created templates to detect CVE-2026-3395 (MaxSite CMS) and CVE-2026-59800 (decolua 9Router), but their exploitation was reported in July, so they are not listed in the August 2026 Vulnerability Table. Additionally, Insikt Group created a Nuclei template to detect GitHub Issue #4255 affecting Apache Log4j, a deserialization allowlist bypass that Apache classified as a hardening gap rather than a Log4j vulnerability; as such, it was not assigned a CVE. These Nuclei templates are available to customers via the Recorded Future Intelligence Platform.
Quick reference: August 2026 vulnerability table
All 70 vulnerabilities below were actively exploited or operationally weaponized in August 2026. This table does not include the three CVEs that were primarily surfaced through honeypot data, which are available to Recorded Future Intelligence Platform customers via the CVE Monthly report. The table below also provides examples of public PoCs identified by Insikt Group. These PoCs were not tested for accuracy or efficacy. Vulnerability management teams should exercise caution and verify the validity of PoCs before testing.
#
Vulnerability
Risk
Score
Vendor/Product
KEV
RCE
PoC
1
CVE-2026-81578
99
PaperCut NG/MF
✓
2
CVE-2026-82078
99
PaperCut NG/MF
✓
✓
3
CVE-2015-3246
99
Red Hat Libuser
✓
4
CVE-2015-5287
99
Red Hat Automatic Bug Reporting Tool
✓
5
CVE-2017-0199
99
Microsoft Office and WordPad
✓
6
CVE-2017-5753
99
Intel
7
CVE-2019-1068
99
Microsoft SQL Server
✓
✓
8
CVE-2019-18935
99
Progress Telerik UI for ASP.NET AJAX
✓
9
CVE-2020-0796
99
Microsoft Windows 10 and Windows Server
✓
10
CVE-2020-1472
99
Microsoft Windows Server
11
CVE-2021-23758
99
Ajax.NET Professional
✓
✓
12
CVE-2021-3156
99
sudo
13
CVE-2022-0847
99
Linux kernel
14
CVE-2022-0995
99
Linux kernel
✓
15
CVE-2023-49105
99
ownCloud
✓
16
CVE-2025-62593
99
Ray-Project Ray
✓
✓
17
CVE-2026-18556
99
N-able N-central
✓
18
CVE-2026-18577
99
N-able N-central
✓
19
CVE-2026-20349
99
Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD)
✓
20
CVE-2026-21962
99
Oracle HTTP Server and Oracle WebLogic Server Proxy Plug-in
✓
21
CVE-2026-33824
99
Microsoft Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Service Extensions
✓
✓
22
CVE-2026-34486
99
Apache Tomcat
✓
23
CVE-2026-39987
99
Marimo
✓
24
CVE-2026-53362
99
Linux kernel
✓
25
CVE-2026-55040
99
Microsoft SharePoint
✓
26
CVE-2026-59310
99
Broadcom VMware vCenter
✓
✓
27
CVE-2026-60004
99
Gitea
✓
✓
28
CVE-2026-63030
99
WordPress
✓
29
CVE-2026-63077
99
JetBrains TeamCity
✓
✓
30
CVE-2026-64849
99
MLflow
✓
31
CVE-2026-65400
99
Apple macOS
✓
32
CVE-2026-68820
99
Microsoft Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock
✓
33
CVE-2026-72529
99
TrueConf Server
✓
34
CVE-2026-72530
99
TrueConf Server
✓
✓
35
CVE-2026-72898
99
Metabase
✓
36
CVE-2026-73570
99
Synacor Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS)
✓
✓
37
CVE-2026-8037
99
Progress LoadMaster
✓
✓
38
CVE-2026-8452
99
Citrix NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway
✓
39
CVE-2026-9198
99
IBM Langflow
✓
✓
40
CVE-2026-66384
92
JFrog Artifactory
✓
41
CVE-2017-7921
89
Hikvision cameras
42
CVE-2021-29441
89
Alibaba Nacos
43
CVE-2024-4577
89
PHP
✓
44
CVE-2025-24813
89
Apache Tomcat
✓
45
CVE-2025-43529
89
Apple Safari, iOS, iPadOS, macOS, tvOS, visionOS, and watchOS
✓
46
CVE-2025-49113
89
Roundcube Webmail
✓
47
CVE-2025-68613
89
n8n
✓
48
CVE-2026-0300
89
Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS
✓
49
CVE-2026-12569
89
PTC Windchill and FlexPLM
✓
50
CVE-2026-21858
89
n8n
51
CVE-2026-3055
89
Citrix NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway
52
CVE-2026-33017
89
Langflow
✓
53
CVE-2010-3904
79
Linux kernel
54
CVE-2020-1013
79
Microsoft Windows
55
CVE-2021-29442
79
Alibaba Nacos
56
CVE-2021-33044
79
Dahua cameras and video devices
57
CVE-2021-33045
79
Dahua cameras and video devices
58
CVE-2022-1040
79
Sophos Firewall
✓
59
CVE-2022-27925
79
Synacor Zimbra Collaboration Suite
✓
60
CVE-2022-47986
79
IBM Aspera Faspex
✓
61
CVE-2023-22527
79
Atlassian Confluence Data Center and Server
✓
62
CVE-2023-46747
79
F5 BIG-IP
✓
63
CVE-2024-55591
79
Fortinet FortiOS and FortiProxy
64
CVE-2025-24472
79
Fortinet FortiOS and FortiProxy
65
CVE-2025-31324
79
SAP NetWeaver Visual Composer
✓
66
CVE-2026-15981
79
miniOrange SAML SSO Login
67
CVE-2026-19478
79
GitLab CE and EE
68
CVE-2026-25895
79
FUXA
✓
69
CVE-2026-61979
79
miniOrange SAML SP SSO
70
CVE-2022-36883
76
Jenkins Git Plugin
Table 1: List of vulnerabilities that were actively exploited in August, 2026 based on Recorded Future data (excluding honeypot-sourced CVEs).
Key trends: August 2026
- August reporting showed two AI-assisted operations: UAT-10147 exploited Zimbra, AjaxPro, Nacos, and Telerik servers before using DeepAudit and PentestGPT after compromise, while a separate Chinese-speaking actor weaponized Hermes Agent and DeepSeek in failed attempts against Langflow and n8n.
- 34 of the 73 vulnerabilities enabled remote code execution (RCE). They affected Microsoft productivity, database, server, and endpoint software; network edge and application delivery appliances; webmail, collaboration, content management, and web server platforms; AI, analytics, developer, and CI/CD services; and operational technology, product lifecycle management, file transfer, videoconferencing, and enterprise integration software.
- We identified public proof-of-concept (PoC) exploits and scanners for 53 of the 73 vulnerabilities.
- The most common weakness classes were CWE-94 (Code Injection) and CWE-502 (Deserialization of Untrusted Data) with seven each, followed by CWE-287 (Improper Authentication) and CWE-306 (Missing Authentication for Critical Function) with six each.
- 17 vulnerabilities were at least five years old, and the oldest was approximately 16 years old.
Trend analysis: AI-assisted workflows scale exploitation and target selection
Insikt Group detailed how Chinese-speaking threat group, UAT-10147, combined conventional exploitation with agentic artificial intelligence (AI) during post-compromise operations against internet-facing Windows and Linux web servers. Cisco Talos observed the threat actor exploiting or weaponizing CVE-2019-18935 in Telerik UI for ASP.NET AJAX, CVE-2021-23758 in AjaxPro, CVE-2021-29441 and CVE-2021-29442 in Nacos, and CVE-2022-27925 in Zimbra for initial access. After compromise, UAT-10147 used CVE-2010-3904, CVE-2015-3246, CVE-2015-5287, CVE-2021-3156, CVE-2022-0847, and CVE-2022-0995 for local privilege escalation on Linux.
UAT-10147 used DeepAudit and PentestGPT to accelerate vulnerability discovery, PoC execution, payload generation, validation, and troubleshooting, but the operation remained semi-autonomous and required human involvement. Its Windows post-compromise activity included the use of EfsPotato, QuasarRAT, BadIIS, ASHX web shells, Defender exclusions for IIS directories, a Google Chrome Start scheduled task, and rogue privileged accounts. On Linux, the threat actor deployed NoodleRAT, SPECTRE, and Meterpreter after gaining root access. When assessed against Recorded Future’s AI Malware Maturity Model (AIM3), this activity falls at Level 4 (Transforming). UAT-10147 used agentic AI systems to orchestrate multi-step exploitation, reconnaissance, payload generation, validation, troubleshooting, and persistence workflows, but the operations remained semi-autonomous and required human involvement rather than running end-to-end without human oversight.
Insikt Group described a separate Chinese-speaking threat actor that used Hermes Agent with DeepSeek to automate target enumeration, public-exploit acquisition, exploit selection, and exploitation attempts. The agent attempted to exploit CVE-2026-33017 (Langflow) against 84 enumerated instances and chained CVE-2026-21858 with CVE-2025-68613 (n8n) while scanning more than 50 additional targets. The Langflow attempt failed because the discovered target lacked the required public-flow conditions, and the n8n attempts failed because the identified forms required authentication. The threat actor also cloned a placeholder repository for CVE-2026-0300 (PAN-OS), although Unit 42 found no evidence that the threat actor modified or executed it.
Additionally, the threat actor also exploited CVE-2026-3055 (NetScaler) to exfiltrate memory from three organizations and searched the output for authentication cookies. The threat actor also exploited CVE-2026-39987 (Marimo) to achieve command execution on 11 Marimo notebook deployments, attempted Java deserialization reverse shells against nine Apache Tomcat servers by leveraging CVE-2026-34486, and attempted reverse-shell callbacks against three Windows Internet Key Exchange virtual private network endpoints with CVE-2026-33824. Across both operations, the Chinese-speaking threat actors combined AI-assisted automation with conventional exploitation techniques.
Additional trends and analyses from July are available to Recorded Future customers.
Take action
Timely and relevant information on vulnerabilities in your environment and that of your vendors and suppliers is critical for reducing risk. Find out how Recorded Future can support your team by increasing visibility, improving efficiency, and enabling confident decisions.
Vulnerability Prioritization – Prioritize vulnerabilities based on the likelihood of exploitation – not just the severity. Easily understand the risk of exploitation alongside severity, and real-time contextualized intelligence to help you quickly make confident decisions, patch what matters, and prevent attacks.
Attack Surface Intelligence – Identify internet-facing assets vulnerable to a specific CVE. Attack Surface Intelligence provides an outside-in view of your organization to help you actively discover, prioritize, and respond to unknown, vulnerable, or misconfigured assets.
Third-Party Risk – Gain an external view of the security posture of your vendors and partners. Eliminate time-consuming research and vendor communication cycles with the ability to promptly assess vulnerabilities in their internet-facing systems.
Insikt Group® – Receive access to exclusive reports on new vulnerabilities and trends from Recorded Future’s team of experts, the Insikt Group®. Download Nuclei templates created by Insikt Group® for select CVEs to detect actively exploited vulnerabilities.
Recorded Future Professional Services – Work with our Professional Services team on a Vulnerability Analysis Engagement. Designed to equip your team with advanced strategies for identifying, prioritizing, and mitigating threats effectively, this program delves into technologies and operations essential for a successful vulnerability management program. (Learn more about how our Professional Services team can help elevate your team by watching our recent Vulnerability Prioritization Workshop)
About Insikt Group®
Recorded Future’s Insikt Group, the company’s threat research division, comprises analysts and security researchers with deep government, law enforcement, military, and intelligence agency experience. Their mission is to produce intelligence that reduces risk for customers, enables tangible outcomes, and prevents business disruption.
Explore expert insights, reports, and tools to strengthen your cybersecurity strategy.
Text extracted automatically; images, tables and formatting may be missing. Original: https://www.recordedfuture.com/blog/august-2026-cve-landscape