Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Nikkei says attackers stole 1.83 million cloud-service records

Original title: Hackers Steal 1.8 Million Records From Nikkei

SecurityWeekby Ionut Arghire ()1 min read1 · 1 read
Part of a story covered by 8 sourcesCapcom confirms CAPCOM ID breach of 11.7 million accountsMerged summary & timeline
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

About 150,000 records held names and contact details; Nikkei says no card data or misuse was found.

Japanese media company Nikkei disclosed that on the morning of October 7 attackers used previously compromised credentials to access a cloud service used for system development and stole 1.83 million records. About 1.68 million contained only non-identifying information; 150,000 included names, addresses, email addresses, phone numbers and dates of birth, and 120,000 contained email addresses. Nikkei says no credit card data was taken, credentials were revoked, regulators were notified, and as of October 16 it found no misuse, disruption or tampering.

Unconfirmed: Nikkei's investigation of scope and the nature of the compromised data was still continuing.

Key facts
  • Access used previously compromised credentials, not a stated software flaw.
  • 150,000 records included names, addresses, emails, phones and birth dates.
  • 120,000 additional records contained email addresses.
  • Nikkei previously disclosed a Slack account hack less than a year earlier.
Security assessment · AI, from the article

Impact: Theft of 1.83 million records, including personal data in a subset

Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at securityweek.com

The compromised information includes names, addresses, email addresses, phone numbers, and dates of birth. The post Hackers Steal 1. 8 Million Records From Nikkei appeared first on SecurityWeek.

SecurityWeek

By Ionut Arghire · securityweek.com

Read the full article at SecurityWeek

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.