Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

oss-security reply doubts a separate list would end vulnerability volume

Original title: Re: Proposal: Add separate oss-security-vulnerability-reports mailing list (for AI vulnpocalypse)

oss-security ()2 · 1 read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Jan Schaumann says reporting stays cheaper than analysis, fixes, and long-term software maintenance.

On October 18, Jan Schaumann replied on oss-security to a proposal for a separate vulnerability-reports list tied to AI findings. He said the idea effectively assumes software vulnerabilities will almost disappear, which he does not expect. He pointed to the cost gap between identifying and reporting issues and analyzing, fixing, and maintaining software.

Key facts
  • Schaumann does not expect security vulnerabilities in software to largely stop.
  • He contrasts cheap reporting with the cost of analysis and fixes.
  • He also cites development, infrastructure, support, and human maintenance costs.
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

Posted by Jan Schaumann on Oct 18 Martin Steigerwald wrote: This sounds akin to proposing that, effectively, there will be (almost) no more security vulnerabilities in our software. I don't see that happening.

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.