ZeroHour
Hacker News · securitypublished ()ingested jacquesm

Tell HN: OpenAI keeps re-enabling the 'allow training' setting

infoAI industryimportance 12
AI summary · glm-5.3-flash

A Hacker News user reports OpenAI's 'allow training' setting re-enables itself after being disabled, raising concerns about opt-out data usage.

A Hacker News user reports resetting OpenAI's 'allow training' opt-out multiple times, with careful tracking, only to find the setting re-enabled on later checks. Commenters speculate about backend sync failures, optimistic UI updates and local storage behavior, or deliberate re-enabling to widen training data usage. Some users report the setting remained disabled, including one EU citizen.

  • The user documented multiple resets and found the training opt-out re-enabled
  • Commenters suggest backend failures, optimistic UI updates or intentional re-enablement
VendorsOpenAI
OrganizationsOpenAI
CountriesUnited States
Full article474 words · extracted from news.ycombinator.com · click to collapse
Tell HN: OpenAI keeps re-enabling the 'allow training' setting
61 points by jacquesm 35 minutes ago | hide | past | favorite | 17 comments

I've reset this more than once and the last time I made a careful note of when I did it and to my surprise I found it re-enabled when I checked just now. Make sure you check this thing to see if it hasn't been re-enabled if you believe it to be off right now.

 help


Does OpenAI use optimistic UI updates? After you disabled the checkbox, it might have had failed in the backend (and not updated the UI).

Verify with devtools to see if that's the case.

For me, with VPN, it fails once in awhile.


Lol, "Outrageous that the company that chose to ignore copyright holder claims, chose to ignore my checkbox of intent despite the implied pinky promise".


I've disabled the checkbox many months ago and it's still disabled today. EU citizen, not sure if that's relevant.


> Make sure you check this thing to see if it hasn't been re-enabled if you believe it to be off right now.

Or simply switch to a competitor. Assuming this is not just a bug, why would one stand for such disrespectful and sneaky behavior?

FWIW, I have not seen this happen for me.


I've noticed that toggle sets a local storage entry, but the value of it doesn't appear to matter at all for new tab loads. I hoped it's "just" a UI bug, but some agent-driven reverse engineering of the page should reveal the answer, as well as how intentional it was.


My cynicism fails me on this matter... do I cynically believe that these companies keep deliberately and routinely re- or un-checking these checkboxes because of the obvious benefits of "whoopsie guess you allowed these after all"? Or do I cynically believe that they are just so completely incompetent and inept at the simple act of maintaining settings that there may be a number of these that are not entirely intentional? As evidenced by the number of other bugs and configuration failures and random settings changes on update I see in other places? Sure, these sorts of settings sure seem to get spontaneously flipped more often than the other ones but they aren't the only settings I've seen get nuked on updates.

Now, obviously, considered as a whole, I think we're looking at "both". But when I wonder about specific cases like this one, that doesn't help.


Oh no… OpenAI, the company who encourages and instructs Apple employees on how to get them data on apple products when they accept an offer?


i mean, the entire company is built upon stealing protected artefacts... i'd be skeptical of any radio box that says "hey if you press this we promise we won't steal your data"

Text extracted automatically; images, tables and formatting may be missing. Original: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49643556