Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Effective Resistance and Graph Neural Network Reliability in Tissue-Specific Interactomes

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLby Jianru Shen ()1 min read2 · 1 read
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Effective resistance in 24 tissue interactomes mostly tracks inverse degree, limiting GNN reliability signals.

The authors test whether effective resistance in tissue-specific protein interaction networks can flag unreliable graph neural network predictions for protein function. Across 24 interactomes the signal is dominated by inverse degree, with Spearman correlation -0.955, and that degeneration deepens as co-expression filtering grows the network. Residual departure from the inverse-degree limit exceeds degree-preserving null graphs in every network and, after controls for entropy, degree, annotation size, local structure, and feature difficulty, explains additional per-node loss in 19 of 24 held-out networks. The added variance is only 0.37% of what the controls leave unexplained, and selective prediction improves negligibly.

Key facts
  • Effective resistance in 24 tissue interactomes tracks inverse degree, Spearman -0.955.
  • Residual departure exceeds degree-preserving null graphs in all 24 networks.
  • After controls, the residual explains extra per-node loss in 19 of 24 networks.
  • Added variance is 0.37%, 5.6 times a permutation floor; selective prediction barely improves.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Protein function annotation needs to know which predictions to distrust, not only what a model predicts. We ask whether tissue-specific interaction structure carries that information. Our candidate signal is effective resistance, used previously to relieve over-squashing by rewiring.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

By Jianru Shen · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.