Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Researchers used Claude to hack OpenAI employees' ChatGPT accounts

The Register · Securityby Jessica Lyons ()2 min read5 · 1 read
Part of a story covered by 3 sourcesHEIF HeistMerged summary & timeline
AI summary · glm-5.3-flashSummaries by Vani AI

Researchers chained a libheif heap overflow with an SSO misconfiguration to take over OpenAI employee ChatGPT accounts, earning a $6,500 bounty.

Hacktron researchers used Claude Opus 4.8 to find a heap buffer overflow in libheif, exposed when OpenAI's Discourse forum routed HEIF uploads through ImageMagick directly to the parser. Claude Opus 5 then generated an exploit achieving remote code execution on OpenAI's community forum, letting them take over an employee's ChatGPT and Codex accounts and open a pull request in the internal monorepo. OpenAI fixed the flaw in about 14 hours and paid a $6,500 Bugcrowd bounty, while Discourse published advisory GHSA-vhm9-85gw-x335 adding image-processing sandboxing. The researchers note community.openai.com testing was excluded from OpenAI's bounty scope but recognized the OpenAI-side finding.

Key facts
  • Discourse routed HEIF uploads through ImageMagick and libheif, exposing the parser
  • Claude Opus 4.8 found the heap overflow; Opus 5 achieved reliable RCE
  • OpenAI patched in about 14 hours and paid a $6,500 Bugcrowd bounty
  • Discourse issued advisory GHSA-vhm9-85gw-x335 with image-processing sandboxing
  • Researchers say AI compresses months of exploit work into days
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

2 min read at theregister.com

Talk about your competitor getting through the door. Security researchers used Anthropic's Claude to help hack into OpenAI employees’ ChatGPT accounts.

The Register · Security

By Jessica Lyons · theregister.com

Read the full article at The Register · Security

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.