Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Neural decompilation candidate selection closes gap on obfuscated binaries

Original title: Rethinking Neural Decompilation: Candidate Selection as the Hidden Bottleneck

arXiv cs.CRby Felix Mächtle ()1 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Generate-then-select pipeline with execution-guided selection reaches 88.8% pass@1 on obfuscated inputs.

LLM4Decompile architecture analysis reveals ground-truth tokens lie within top-five predictions in 95.6% of positions. A generate-then-select pipeline ranks 100 candidates per input using static and execution-based selectors. Negative perplexity emerges as strongest static selector while execution-guided selection nearly closes oracle gap on ExeBench after fine-tuning on newly released ExeBench-Obfuscated dataset.

Key facts
  • pass@100 of 93% on HumanEval-Decompile
  • 95.6% ground-truth tokens in top-five predictions
  • 88.8% pass@1 after fine-tuning
  • Contradicts prior claims about LLM4Decompile
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Reverse engineering obfuscated binaries is a core task in malware analysis and software security auditing.

arXiv cs.CR

By Felix Mächtle · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.