Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Alignment tax is graded and task-selective in DPO

Original title: The Alignment Tax Is Graded: Task-Selective Capability Loss Under Length-Normalized DPO with SFT Retention

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLby Ye Yuan ()1 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Length-normalized DPO with SFT retention causes selective capability loss, preserving extraction but harming router tasks.

The study fine-tunes Qwen3.5-4B with sparse LoRA and length-normalized DPO plus SFT retention on structured financial tasks. It tracks downstream capability as implicit reward margin grows. Findings show the alignment tax is graded: extraction is preserved while router degrades severely. The margin acts almost entirely via suppression of rejected completions.

Key facts
  • Alignment tax is task-selective
  • Extraction preserved with minimal loss
  • Router degrades severely
  • Margin accounted for by rejected completions
  • Gold-logp deflation varies by task
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Setting. This is an empirical characterization study; we propose no new method and run no comparisons against alternative objectives. We fine-tune Qwen3.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

By Ye Yuan · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.