Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Economic model finds most SOC LLM setups unprofitable

Original title: From Hype to ROI: An Economic Model for LLM Adoption in Information Systems and Security Operations

arXiv cs.CRby Pellegrino Casoria ()1 min read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Monte Carlo results limit profitability to high-accuracy, low-uncertainty deployments across analyzed prices.

Researchers propose an economic model for LLM adoption in operational information systems, treating uncertain inputs as random variables around published benchmarks. A first case maps SOC workflows to standards and weighs alert volume, analyst effort, and model efficiency against inference, infrastructure, and error-remediation costs. Cloud API and self-hosted options are both covered. Across the analyzed models and prices, most configurations lose money; accuracy matters more than error cost or model price.

Unconfirmed: Profitability figures come from the authors' simulated assumptions, not measured SOC deployments.

Key facts
  • ROI outputs include profitability probability and Value at Risk.
  • A sensitivity analysis identifies the main economic drivers.
  • The model covers cloud API and self-hosted deployments.
  • Automation value is described as gated by accuracy.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Large Language Models (LLMs) promise significant efficiency gains across information-intensive operations by automating repetitive language-based tasks. However, adoption decisions remain largely opportunistic, as organizations struggle to move from pilots to sustainable industrialization. Without systematic economic frameworks, practitioners cannot assess whether LLM investments create value in a given context.

arXiv cs.CR

By Pellegrino Casoria · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.