Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

You've Got a BUD in Me: Authenticated Reads from Per-Block Write Logs

arXiv cs.CRby Alejandro Ranchal-Pedrosa ()1 min read5 · 5 reads
AI summary · glm-5.3-flashSummaries by Vani AI

Researchers propose BUD, per-block write-log digests enabling blockchain validators to serve historical membership and exclusion proofs far cheaper than state-wide tries.

The paper introduces Block Update Digests (BUD), which authenticate each block's write log with predecessor pointers, plus a SuperBUD and exponential hierarchy to turn long unchanged intervals into short proofs. Soundness against adversarial provers and up to f Byzantine validators is proven under archive, attestation, and committee evidence assumptions. Benchmarks show a 50x state-size increase raises the base-BUD path only 1.24x versus 3.1x for in-memory and 69.5x for disk-backed Merkle Patricia tries, with read payloads below 800 bytes and p99 warm verification at 146 microseconds.

Key facts
  • BUD authenticates per-block write logs instead of whole-state structures
  • Supports historical membership and exclusion proofs with logarithmic digest counts
  • Proved sound against adversarial provers and f Byzantine validators
  • 1.24x path growth at 50x state size vs 69.5x for disk-backed MPT
  • Read payloads under 800 bytes; 146 microseconds p99 warm verification
Analyze this story with Vani AIImpact, who is affected and what defenders should do, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Blockchains usually pay for authenticated reads by maintaining a structure that spans the entire state. We show how validators can support historical membership and exclusion proofs by authenticating each block's writes instead. A Block Update Digest (BUD) commits a write log whose predecessor pointers link successive modifications of each key.

arXiv cs.CR

By Alejandro Ranchal-Pedrosa · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.