Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Persona generalization follows a shared line across Qwen and Llama

Original title: Is Persona Generalization Predictable?

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLby Olina Mukherjee ()1 min read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Fine-tuning only later layers keeps strong in-domain learning while reducing out-of-domain unsafe transfer.

The paper reports an approximately probit-linear link between in-domain and out-of-domain persona rates after fine-tuning, including the unsafe behavior seen in emergent misalignment. That relationship is shared across hyperparameters and, surprisingly, across model families and sizes including Qwen and Llama. Learning rate, weight decay, and duration mostly move models along the same line. Changing which layers are trained can change the slope.

Key facts
  • The relationship is described as approximately probit-linear.
  • Qwen and Llama share the reported line across families and sizes.
  • Learning rate, weight decay, and duration mainly weaken in-domain learning.
  • Later-layer-only fine-tuning yields shallower slopes for unsafe behavior.
  • The authors frame this as a way to predict and control behavioral transfer.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Persona generalization occurs when fine-tuning a language model in one domain induces behavioral changes in others -- for example, the broadly unsafe behavior observed in emergent misalignment.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

By Olina Mukherjee · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.