Fireworks AI breach exposed Notion customers’ chat transcripts
Original title: Cyberattack on Fireworks AI allowed hackers to access Notion customers’ chat transcripts
Notion says about 1% of its customers were affected, including Insights chat inputs and model outputs.
Fireworks AI confirmed an attacker breached its cloud provider and reached a development system, taking customer billing information and some datasets. Notion, a confirmed customer, said the incident affected about 1% of its own customers and that hackers stole chat transcripts from Notion AI users of the Insights feature, including model inputs and outputs. On November 3, Notion disconnected from Fireworks, deleted stored data, and stopped connectivity. Fireworks said it believes the attackers are financially motivated and focused on selling access tokens for large language models. This follows another Fireworks security incident in October.
Unconfirmed: Fireworks says it believes the attackers are financially motivated and mainly seeking to resell model-access tokens.
- Fireworks said the attacker reached a development system through its cloud provider.
- Notion said much of the stolen chat data could not be tied to a customer.
- Harvey and Cursor are named Fireworks customers but are not confirmed affected.
- Fireworks described this as its second breach in as many months.
Impact: Billing data, datasets, and Notion AI chat transcripts exposed
- Vendors
- Fireworks AI
- Products
- Notion AI
- Victims
- Notion
From the original article
2 min read at techcrunch.com
A cyberattack at Fireworks AI has exposed some of its customers’ data, the company has confirmed. Fireworks AI, a platform that developers use to access and use open AI models, said an attacker breached its cloud provider to gain access to a Fireworks development system, which allowed access to some of its customers’ data.
By Zack Whittaker · techcrunch.com
A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.