Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Prediction-powered Neural Architecture Search

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLby Pascal Janetzky ()1 min read2
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

PPNAS combines scarce architecture labels with zero-cost proxies for label-efficient neural architecture search.

PPNAS applies prediction-powered inference to neural architecture search, combining a small set of architectures with observed performance labels and a much larger set scored by noisy zero-cost proxies. Zero-cost proxies supply ordinal pairwise ranking supervision, and PPI corrects systematic gaps between proxy rankings and true performance. In end-to-end predictor-based NAS, the method reports state-of-the-art results when evaluation budgets are limited. The authors describe it as the first prediction-powered approach to label-efficient NAS.

Key facts
  • PPNAS fuses scarce true labels with large-scale zero-cost proxy scores.
  • Ordinal proxy rankings supply pairwise supervision that PPI then debiases.
  • End-to-end predictor-based NAS is state-of-the-art under limited budgets.
  • Authors call it the first prediction-powered method for label-efficient NAS.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Evaluating candidate architectures in neural architecture search (NAS) faces an inherent trade-off: on the one hand, reliable performance labels are limited because training and evaluating architectures is costly; on the other hand, zero-cost proxies (ZCPs) are cheap to compute at large scale but can be noisy. Yet, how to effectively combine these two sources of supervision remains unclear.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

By Pascal Janetzky · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.