Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Particle Competition and Cooperation for Robust Graph Convolutional Network Learning Under Label Noise

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLby Fabricio Breve ()1 min read1
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

PCC+GCN refines noisy graph labels before training, slightly beating a baseline GCN with lower runtime.

PCC+GCN uses Particle Competition and Cooperation to detect suspicious labeled nodes and preserve, remove, or reassign their labels before Graph Convolutional Network training. The method was tested on ten NoisyGL datasets under Uniform, Pair, Random, and instance-dependent label noise, with hyperparameter analysis on Cora, CiteSeer, and PubMed. Under conventional noise it had the best average accuracy and rank, gaining 1.67 percentage points over a baseline GCN, and under instance-dependent noise it stayed competitive while being the fastest robust method on eight of ten datasets.

Key facts
  • PCC refines labels by preserving, removing, or reassigning suspicious nodes before GCN training.
  • Tested on ten NoisyGL datasets under Uniform, Pair, Random, and instance-dependent noise.
  • Average gain is 1.67 points over a baseline GCN across clean and conventional noise settings.
  • Under instance-dependent noise it is the fastest robust method on eight of ten datasets.
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs) are highly sensitive to label noise, since corrupted supervision can propagate through the graph and degrade learned node representations. This work proposes PCC+GCN, a hybrid framework that uses Particle Competition and Cooperation (PCC) as a graph-based label-refinement stage before GCN training.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

By Fabricio Breve · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.