Studying Image Tokenizers as Visual Languages in Unified Multimodal Models
A controlled pure-autoregressive testbed shows task-specific validation losses rank image tokenizers differently, with I2T loss the most consistent signal.
Researchers built a controlled pure-autoregressive testbed and tracked task-specific validation losses during multimodal continual pretraining across text, image, text-to-image (T2I), and image-to-text (I2T) prediction. They find losses should be analyzed per task because they exhibit distinct scaling behavior and rank tokenizers differently, and that the loss-performance relationship depends on the predicted token space. I2T loss, computed over a shared text vocabulary, correlates consistently with both generation and visual understanding performance after supervised finetuning. Case studies revisit the discriminator, semantic supervision, and vocabulary size as tokenizer design axes.
- Task-specific validation losses show distinct scaling behavior and rank image tokenizers differently.
- I2T loss over a shared text vocabulary gives the most consistent cross-tokenizer signal.
- I2T loss correlates with both generation and visual understanding performance after supervised finetuning.
- Better image reconstruction does not necessarily yield lower task losses or stronger downstream performance.
- Image tokenizer choice affects text modeling under joint multimodal optimization.
Full article250 words · extracted from arxiv.org · click to collapse
Image tokenizers define the ``visual language'' of unified multimodal models, yet are commonly studied through isolated metrics or generation-/understanding-only evaluations. These evaluations do not fully capture how visual tokens behave when modeled jointly with text. We build a controlled pure-autoregressive testbed and track task-specific validation losses during multimodal continual pretraining across text, image, text-to-image (T2I), and image-to-text (I2T) prediction. We examine how these losses scale and relate to downstream performance, then use them to study multimodal learnability---how well image and text tokens are jointly modeled---and tokenizer design. We find that (1) losses should be analyzed by task, since they exhibit distinct scaling behavior and rank tokenizers differently. (2) The loss--performance relationship depends on the predicted token space: for a fixed tokenizer, T2I and I2T losses correlate with generation quality, but across tokenizers, the T2I loss--performance relationship shifts with the image-token space, whereas I2T loss, computed over a shared text vocabulary, provides a more consistent signal. I2T loss also correlates with both generation and visual understanding performance after supervised finetuning. Using losses as a lens, we show that (3) better reconstruction does not necessarily yield lower task-specific losses or stronger downstream performance, and that (4) image tokenizer choice can affect text modeling under joint optimization. As case studies, we revisit three tokenizer design axes---the discriminator, semantic supervision, and vocabulary size---to examine their effects on joint modeling and downstream performance. Together, our testbed offers a complementary perspective on image tokenizers as visual languages, highlighting their interplay with text in joint multimodal training.
Text extracted automatically; images, tables and formatting may be missing. Original: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09143