Confidence Comes from Experience: Experiential Confidence Estimation from Reasoning to Agents
XConf estimates LLM confidence from accumulated past episodes, improving calibration and discrimination across nine benchmarks at one-tenth self-consistency cost.
Researchers propose XConf, an experiential confidence estimator that augments current inference with a stored record of the model's graded past episodes, including reflections, stated confidence, outcomes, and lessons. A Recall stage retrieves episodes from similar tasks with similar stated confidence and reads off historical success rates, while a Reflect stage prompts the model to name recurring failure modes and restate confidence. Across nine benchmarks in reasoning, coding, multimodal QA, and interactive agents, and four models from three families, XConf beats or matches ten-sample self-consistency in AUROC on 23 of 24 comparisons with much lower ECE, at a tenth of the generation cost. For selective prediction, abstaining on the 10% least-confident episodes raises delivered success rate by up to 8.7 points on agent tasks.
- Stores graded past episodes with reflections, stated confidence, outcomes, and lessons for retrieval.
- Recall stage reads historical success rates for similar tasks and confidence levels.
- Beats or matches ten-sample self-consistency AUROC on 23 of 24 comparisons at one-tenth the cost.
- Requires no logit access or weight updates; abstention lifts agent success up to 8.7 points.
From the original article
1 min read at huggingface.coReliable confidence estimation is increasingly central to the trustworthy deployment of language models: a calibrated estimate of the probability that an output is correct decides what to ship, what to escalate, and what to retry.
By Caiqi Zhang, Xiaochen Zhu, Chengzu Li · huggingface.co
A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.