Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Robots::Validate before 0.4.10 mislabels clients as robots (CVE-2026-112921)

Original title: CVE-2026-112921: Robots::Validate versions from 0.4.3 before 0.4.10 for Perl report clients as imposter robots when User-Agent matcher state carries over from a previous request

oss-security ()
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

User-Agent matcher state from an earlier request can make the next client look like an imposter robot.

Robert Rothenberg reported CVE-2026-112921 in the Perl distribution Robots::Validate on oss-security. Versions from 0.4.3 before 0.4.10 can report clients as imposter robots when User-Agent matcher state carries over from a previous request. The note points to the MetaCPAN release; the snippet does not discuss exploitation or a patch timeline.

Unconfirmed: The feed snippet does not state whether 0.4.10 is already published or whether the issue has been exploited.

Key facts
  • Affected range stated in the report is 0.4.3 before 0.4.10.
  • The bug is leftover matcher state between requests, not a remote code flaw.
  • The oss-security post is dated October 21.
Security assessment · AI, from the article

Impact: Clients can be wrongly reported as imposter robots

ProductAffectedFixed in
Robots::Validate0.4.3 before 0.4.100.4.10
What to do
  1. 1.Upgrade Robots::Validate to 0.4.10 or later.
Analyze CVE-2026-112921 with Vani AIImpact, affected versions, exploitation, mitigations and detection

Vulnerabilities mentioned

All
CVEVulnerabilityCVSSEPSSSignalsPublished
CVE-2026-112921
Robots::Validate versions from 0.4.3 before 0.4.10 for Perl report clients as imposter robots when User-Agent matcher state carries over from a previous request
7.3—

From the original article

Posted by Robert Rothenberg on Oct 21 ======================================================================== https://metacpan. org/dist/Robots-Validate VCS Repo:...

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.