Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

IAMRAGBENCH benchmark shows RAG poisoning risks in LLM-generated AWS IAM policies

Original title: IAMRAGBENCH: Benchmarking Authorization Expansions in LLM-Generated AWS IAM Policies under RAG Poisoning

arXiv cs.CRby Hasan Kaplan ()1 min read1 · 1 read
AI summary · x-ai/grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

The 60-case benchmark uncovers 46 goal-matched attacks from poisoned context on five AWS endpoints.

LLMs using RAG synthesize AWS IAM policies from tasks and documents. Attacker-controlled context can produce provider-valid policies exceeding trusted authorization. IAMRAGBENCH evaluates this with deterministic scoring and case-specific validation, finding high rates of authorization deltas and goal-matched violations.

Key facts
  • 60-case benchmark covering scope, conditions, denies, trust, boundaries, and delegation
  • 49 exact authorization deltas from included-context exposure
  • 46/292 goal-matched attacks at 15.75%
  • BM25 retrieves poisons for all tasks at k=5
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat
Tags
rag-poisoningaws-iambenchmark
Products
IAM policies
Organizations
AWS
AI models
LLM

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Large language models (LLMs) using retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) can synthesize Amazon Web Services (AWS) Identity and Access Management (IAM) policies from tasks and operational documents. Attacker-controlled context may induce provider-valid policies that exceed trusted authorization requirements.

arXiv cs.CR

By Hasan Kaplan · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.CR

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.