Skip to content
NewA calmer, faster ZeroHour

Inference-Time Steering Across Scaffolds and Epitopes for Sample-Efficient De Novo Nanobody Design

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CLby Mason Minot ()1 min read3 · 2 reads
AI summary · grok-4.7Summaries by Vani AI

Inference-time budget allocators raise designable nanobody yield nearly fivefold per GPU-hour.

The paper recasts scaffold and epitope selection for de novo nanobody design as an inference-time compute-allocation problem rather than a fixed upfront choice. It introduces a joint Global Sequential Monte Carlo allocator and a decoupled Batched Successive Elimination method that steer Feynman-Kac sampling toward high-reward candidates. Empirically, the allocators raise designable-candidate yield per GPU-hour by nearly 5× without reducing diversity across therapeutic targets and generative configurations.

Key facts
  • Scaffold and epitope choice treated as compute allocation
  • Global SMC and Batched Successive Elimination allocators proposed
  • Nearly 5× more designable candidates per GPU-hour
  • Diversity held across therapeutic targets and configurations
Explain this AI news with Vani AIWhat was announced, what is new and why it matters, in a new chat

From the original article

1 min read at arxiv.org

Generative molecular design typically relies on over-generation and post-hoc filtering. Inference-time steering methods like Feynman-Kac (FK) steering improve efficiency by biasing trajectories toward high-reward candidates, yet they optimize within a single fixed configuration. In de novo nanobody design, upfront commitment to conditioning choices like scaffold identity or target epitope creates a bottleneck.

arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

By Mason Minot · arxiv.org

Read the full article at arXiv cs.AI / cs.LG / cs.CL

A short excerpt; the article and its images belong to the publisher. Summary, key facts and assessment above are AI-written from the article and can be wrong.